Journal of Applied Physiology

30.6k papers and 1.3M indexed citations i.

About

The 30.6k papers published in Journal of Applied Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 1.3M indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Applied Physiology usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (9.5k papers), Physiology (9.1k papers) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (5.6k papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4.5k papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (4.3k papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Applied Physiology are Brian J. Whipp, Bengt Saltin, John W. Severinghaus, J. Mead, Harry H. Pennes, Roger M. Enoka, D. L. Costill, Edward F. Coyle, Jerome A. Dempsey and John B. West.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Applied Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Applied Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Applied Physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Applied Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Applied Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Applied Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Applied Physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025