Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place
201513.9k citationsSebastiaan Theodorus Michaël Peek, Katrien Luijkx et al.Gerontologyprofile →
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
2014745 citationsSebastiaan Theodorus Michaël Peek, Eveline Wouters et al.profile →
Forty years of Fanger’s model of thermal comfort: comfort for all?
Countries citing papers authored by Joost van Hoof
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Joost van Hoof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joost van Hoof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joost van Hoof more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joost van Hoof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joost van Hoof. The network helps show where Joost van Hoof may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joost van Hoof
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joost van Hoof.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joost van Hoof based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Joost van Hoof. Joost van Hoof is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Peek, Sebastiaan Theodorus Michaël, Katrien Luijkx, Marianne Nieboer, et al.. (2015). Older Adults' Reasons for Using Technology while Aging in Place. Gerontology. 62(2). 226–237.13940 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Marston, Hannah R., et al.. (2015). The use of mood boards to study housing needs of nursing home residents with dementia. 2(4). 62–71.2 indexed citations
13.
Hoof, Joost van, et al.. (2014). The environmental design of residential care facilities: A sense of home through the eyes of nursing home residents.. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).6 indexed citations
14.
Hoof, Joost van, et al.. (2014). Exploring Technological and Architectural Solutions for Nursing Home Residents,Care Professionals and Technical Staff: Focus Groups With Professional Stakeholders. 1(3). 90–105.4 indexed citations
15.
Hoof, Joost van, et al.. (2009). Thermal Comfort and integrated building design for older people with dementia. Building and Environment.11 indexed citations
16.
Hoof, Joost van, et al.. (2006). Searching for the Holy Grail of International Education: Feedback from Hospitality Management Study Abroad Participants. FIU hospitality review. 24(1). 49–59.7 indexed citations
17.
Hoof, Joost van & Jlm Jan Hensen. (2005). Nieuwe Nederlandse comfortnormen nader bekeken. TU/e Research Portal. 34(3). 46–53.1 indexed citations
18.
Hoof, Joost van, et al.. (2004). Bezoekerscomfort in IJslandse graswoningen : meetexpeditie Eindhovense Bouwfysica-studenten. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 33. 68–69.1 indexed citations
19.
Hoof, Joost van, et al.. (2002). Creating an International Hospitality Management Major. FIU hospitality review. 20(1). 59–66.1 indexed citations
20.
Hoof, Joost van, et al.. (1999). Why Send Students Abroad. FIU hospitality review. 17(1). 7.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.