This map shows the geographic impact of John Benseman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Benseman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Benseman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Benseman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Benseman. The network helps show where John Benseman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Benseman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Benseman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Benseman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John Benseman. John Benseman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Benseman, John. (2015). Responding to Pasifika adults' literacy needs through workplace programs : an evaluation. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
Benseman, John. (2013). Planning and teaching effective workplace literacy, language and numeracy programmes : what does research tell us?. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
4.
Benseman, John. (2013). Recruiting and retaining learners in workplace literacy programs in New Zealand. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology). 53(1). 6–23.1 indexed citations
5.
Benseman, John. (2013). Adult education : New Zealand, to 2012. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
6.
Benseman, John. (2008). Foundation learning in New Zealand: an overview. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology).2 indexed citations
7.
Benseman, John. (2006). Moving Towards Lifelong Learning in Rural New Zealand: A Study of Two Towns. Journal of Research in Rural Education. 21(4). 1–11.2 indexed citations
8.
Benseman, John. (2006). Making lifelong learning work in rural New Zealand : a study of two towns. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
9.
Benseman, John. (2005). Paradigm re-gained? the re-emergence of lifelong learning in New Zealand in the late 1990s. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology).2 indexed citations
10.
Benseman, John. (2005). Paradigm lost? : lifelong education in New Zealand in the 1970s and 1980s. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology).3 indexed citations
11.
Benseman, John, et al.. (2005). Pedagogy in practice: an observational study of literacy, numeracy and language teachers. Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology).4 indexed citations
Benseman, John, et al.. (1999). Evaluating Adult Literacy Programs at the Community Provider Level.. 9(1). 21–35.1 indexed citations
16.
Benseman, John. (1999). Superhighway or Dirt Road? Moving beyond the Hype with Computer Mediated Communication.. 39(3).4 indexed citations
17.
Scott, Kathryn, et al.. (1999). Dealing with a bleeding nuisance: a study of haemophilia care in New Zealand.. PubMed. 112(1087). 155–8.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.