John Bailey

3.0k citations
109 papers · 2.1k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

John Bailey

98 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

John Bailey
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Mechanical Engineering 749
  • Plant Science 461
  • Mechanics of Materials 280
  • Clinical Psychology 168
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 133
Replace Peter J. Lillford with:
Peter J. Lillford United Kingdom
Hiroshi Ono Japan
Ingvar Johansson Sweden
Wenyu Ye China
Xiwen Liu China
P. Sherman United Kingdom
Satoshi Mochizuki Japan
Jianbin Chen China
Tohru Takahashi Japan
Hans Schaefer Germany
John Bailey relative to Peter J. Lillford United Kingdom Peter J. Lillford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19×
Peter J. Lillford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Bailey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Bailey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Bailey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Bailey. The network helps show where John Bailey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Bailey Line = papers co-authored together John Bailey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 109 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994430
2 1994211
3 1975103
4 199977
5 199270
6 199965
7 197658
8 201044
9 200242
10 199241
11 199940
12 199236
13 201134
14 197733
15 198629
16 201027
17 197226
18 201126
19 198825
20 199525

About John Bailey

John Bailey is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Clinical Psychology, having authored 109 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced machining processes and optimization (22 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (20 papers), Metal Alloys Wear and Properties (19 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (9 papers), Advanced materials and composites (9 papers), Metallurgy and Material Forming (7 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanical Engineering (749 citations), Plant Science (461 citations), Mechanics of Materials (280 citations), Clinical Psychology (168 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (133 citations). John Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John W. Mansfıeld, Edward E. Farmer, Jamal Sheikh-Ahmad, M. J. MacCulloch, Hans D. VanEtten, Shaik Jeelani, Katherine M. Phillips, David M. Ruggio, D. T. Wickramasinghe and D. Joseph Daniel. Their work appears in journals such as Wear, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Journal of Employment Counseling and BJGP Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact