Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Extraction and characterization of lignin from different biomass resources
2014619 citationsMd. Nuruddin, Mahesh Hosur et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Shaik Jeelani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaik Jeelani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaik Jeelani more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaik Jeelani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaik Jeelani. The network helps show where Shaik Jeelani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shaik Jeelani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shaik Jeelani.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shaik Jeelani based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Shaik Jeelani. Shaik Jeelani is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nuruddin, Md., et al.. (2017). Flexural, Viscoelastic and Thermal Properties of Epoxy Polymer Composites Modified with Cellulose Nanofibers Extracted from Wheat Straw. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.6 indexed citations
6.
Hosur, Mahesh, et al.. (2016). Studies on the Synthesis and Characterization of Epoxidized Soybean Oil.3 indexed citations
7.
Rangari, Vijay, et al.. (2014). Bio-based calcium carbonate (CaCO3) nanoparticles for drug delivery applications.2 indexed citations
Hassan, Tarig A., et al.. (2010). Mechanochemical and Sonochemical Synthesis of Bio Based Nanoparticles. TechConnect Briefs. 3(2010). 278–281.3 indexed citations
13.
Hossain, Md. Emran, Mohammad K. Hossain, Mahesh Hosur, Shaik Jeelani, & Vijay Rangari. (2010). Fabrication and Thermomechanical Characterization of CNF-Filled Polyester and E-Glass/Polyester Nanophased Composites. TechConnect Briefs. 1(2010). 111–114.2 indexed citations
Rangari, Vijaya, et al.. (2008). Synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles and its applications in drug delivery systems. TechConnect Briefs. 2(2008). 390–393.4 indexed citations
16.
Jeelani, Shaik, et al.. (2007). Effect of particle size on the mechanical properties of polymer matrix nanocomposite. TechConnect Briefs. 1(2007). 316–319.1 indexed citations
17.
Hassan, Tarig A., Shaik Jeelani, Hassan Mahfuz, & Vijaya Rangari. (2006). Synthesis of Shear Thickening Fluid Using Sonochemical Method. TechConnect Briefs. 2(2006). 637–640.5 indexed citations
18.
Hosur, Mahesh, et al.. (2005). Low-Velocity Impact Response of Carbon/Epoxy Laminates Subjected to Temperature And Moisture Conditioning.2 indexed citations
19.
Mahfuz, Hassan, et al.. (2004). Synthesis & Mechanical Characterization of Carbon/Epoxy Composites Reinforced with SiC Nano Particles. TechConnect Briefs. 3(2004). 302–307.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.