John B. Bishop

35 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

John B. Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • General Psychology 20
  • Social Psychology 275
  • Clinical Psychology 212
  • Safety Research 58
  • Occupational Therapy 21
Replace James M. Benshoff with:
James M. Benshoff United States
Garrett J. McAuliffe United States
Rick Jay Short United States
Pamela O. Paisley United States
Nancy Bodenhorn United States
Sandy Magnuson United States
Felicisima C. Serafica United States
Len Jennings United States
Edward S. Neukrug United States
Mary A. Fukuyama United States
John B. Bishop relative to James M. Benshoff United States James M. Benshoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
James M. Benshoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John B. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John B. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John B. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John B. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John B. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John B. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John B. Bishop. The network helps show where John B. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside John B. Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John B. Bishop Line = papers co-authored together John B. Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199069
2
A Survey of Counseling Needs of Male and Female College Students.
199858
3 201749
4 200640
5 201028
6 197126
7 201226
8 199524
9 200623
10 197521
11 197420
12 201216
13 200413
14 198711
15 197911
16 199310
17 200310
18 19739
19 19848
20 19877

About John B. Bishop

John B. Bishop is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 36 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (18 papers), Mentoring and Academic Development (7 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Disability Education and Employment (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (1 paper) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (20 citations), Social Psychology (275 citations), Clinical Psychology (212 citations), Safety Research (58 citations) and Occupational Therapy (21 citations). John B. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard S. Sharf, Karen W. Bauer, K. Alisa Lowrey, Aleksandra Hollingshead, Andrew Huddleston, James D. Marshall, Donna E. Alvermann and Robert C. Lane. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Counseling Psychology, Journal of Counseling & Development, Counselor Education and Supervision, Journal of college student development and Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact