Joël de Leiris

97 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Joël de Leiris
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 603
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 695
  • Biochemistry 225
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 559
  • Developmental Neuroscience 88
Replace I. Tong Mak with:
I. Tong Mak United States
Rana M. Temsah Canada
Okezie I. Aruoma United Kingdom
Véronique Maupoil France
E K Lai United States
Gerald A. Cordis United States
E. Altomare Italy
T. Metsä‐Ketelä Finland
Kirstin Wingler Germany
Murat Yağmurca Türkiye
Joël de Leiris relative to I. Tong Mak United States I. Tong Mak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
I. Tong Mak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joël de Leiris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joël de Leiris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joël de Leiris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joël de Leiris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joël de Leiris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joël de Leiris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joël de Leiris. The network helps show where Joël de Leiris may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joël de Leiris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joël de Leiris Line = papers co-authored together Joël de Leiris links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008189
2 1978128
3 200199
4 197573
5 201272
6 200271
7 200464
8 200463
9 200761
10 200657
11 200051
12 200349
13 199748
14 199547
15 200443
16 199943
17 199842
18 201041
19
Myocardial kinetics of TcN-NOET: a neutral lipophilic complex tracer of regional myocardial blood flow.
199539
20 199838

About Joël de Leiris

Joël de Leiris is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Molecular Biology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (32 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (12 papers), Trace Elements in Health (12 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (12 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (10 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (9 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (8 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (603 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (695 citations), Biochemistry (225 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (559 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (88 citations). Joël de Leiris has collaborated with scholars based in France, Hungary and Burkina Faso. Frequent co-authors include François Boucher, Stéphane Tanguy, Michel de Lorgeril, Patricia Salen, Charles Coudray, Sylvie Pucheu, D. Feuvray, Sophie Besse, A. Favier and David J. Hearse. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, Basic Research in Cardiology, Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology and Antioxidants and Redox Signaling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact