Replace Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology with:
Canadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologyCanada
Journal of Cardiovascular PharmacologyUnited States
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and PhysiologyAustralia
Frontiers in NeurologyChina
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of PharmacologyGermany
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory InvestigationDenmark
American Journal of Physiology-Legacy ContentUnited States
EpilepsiaUnited States
Acta Neurologica ScandinavicaUnited States
Journal of NeurologyGermany
Canadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologyCanadaView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Basic Research in Cardiology
Basic Research in Cardiology · 1×
×0.727.6kCCM
×1.659.4kMB
×0.510.4kPFM
×1.317.0kSURGE
×3.440.8kPHYSI
Citations per year, relative to Basic Research in Cardiology
Basic Research in Cardiology · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Basic Research in Cardiology
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Basic Research in Cardiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Basic Research in Cardiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Basic Research in Cardiology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Basic Research in Cardiology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Basic Research in Cardiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Basic Research in Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.