Jodi Lofchy

687 citations
18 papers · 516 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jodi Lofchy

18 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

Jodi Lofchy
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Family Practice 57
  • Clinical Psychology 270
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 144
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 175
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
Replace Amy Weil with:
Amy Weil United States
Lisa A. Mellman United States
Margaret Haglund United States
Nicole S. Cooper Canada
Paul B. Lieberman United States
O. O. Famuyiwa Nigeria
Terry A. Travis United States
Neil B. Rappaport United States
Bruno Perotta Brazil
Julia Huber Germany
Jodi Lofchy relative to Amy Weil United States Amy Weil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Amy Weil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jodi Lofchy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jodi Lofchy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jodi Lofchy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jodi Lofchy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jodi Lofchy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jodi Lofchy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jodi Lofchy. The network helps show where Jodi Lofchy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jodi Lofchy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jodi Lofchy Line = papers co-authored together Jodi Lofchy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2000164
2 200863
3 199655
4 200649
5 199343
6 200539
7 199716
8 201015
9 199915
10
Emergency Psychiatry: Clinical and Training Approaches.
201514
11 201012
12
La psychiatrie d’urgence : formation et pratique clinique
20159
13 20177
14 20106
15 20234
16 20032
17 20042
18 20131

About Jodi Lofchy

Jodi Lofchy is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 18 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (57 citations), Clinical Psychology (270 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (144 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (175 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (13 citations). Jodi Lofchy has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Isaac Sakinofsky, Brian Hodges, Elspeth Bradley, Richard G. Tiberius, Glenn Regehr, Katharina Manassis, Mark R. Katz, Diana Blank, Jakub Z. Konarski and Roger S. McIntyre. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Psychiatry, Current Psychiatry Reports, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Academic Medicine and General Hospital Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact