Neil B. Rappaport
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Phillip J. BrantleyCraig D. WaggonerGlenn N. JonesTimothy A. BrownThomas J. PayneCheryl A. JohnsonRobert G. RychtarikPatrick O. Smith
- Topics
- Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers)Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyAddictive BehaviorsHeadache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Neil B. Rappaport
14 papers receiving 465 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Clinical Psychology 141
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 109
- Psychiatry and Mental health 91
- Social Psychology 82
- General Health Professions 66
Countries citing papers authored by Neil B. Rappaport
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil B. Rappaport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil B. Rappaport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil B. Rappaport more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil B. Rappaport
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil B. Rappaport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil B. Rappaport. The network helps show where Neil B. Rappaport may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil B. Rappaport
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil B. Rappaport. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil B. Rappaport based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil B. Rappaport. Neil B. Rappaport is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | |
| 2 | 44 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 319 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 27 |
About Neil B. Rappaport
Neil B. Rappaport is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Law and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 492 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jury Decision Making Processes (3 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (51 citations), Applied Psychology (64 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (109 citations). Neil B. Rappaport has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Phillip J. Brantley, Craig D. Waggoner, Glenn N. Jones, Timothy A. Brown, Thomas J. Payne, Cheryl A. Johnson, Robert G. Rychtarik, Patrick O. Smith, William D. Marelich and Dannie Hoffman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Addictive Behaviors and Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.