Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Detecting, Preventing, and Mitigating Online Firestorms in Brand Communities
2019253 citationsDennis Herhausen, Stephan Ludwig et al.Journal of Marketingprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Wulf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Wulf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Wulf more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Wulf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Wulf. The network helps show where Jochen Wulf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jochen Wulf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jochen Wulf.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jochen Wulf based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jochen Wulf. Jochen Wulf is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wulf, Jochen, Tobias Mettler, Stephan Ludwig, & Dennis Herhausen. (2019). A COMPUTATIONAL VISUAL ANALYSIS OF IMAGE DESIGN IN SOCIAL MEDIA CAR MODEL COMMUNITIES. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
2.
Dremel, Christian, et al.. (2019). A Socio-Technical Approach to Manage Analytics-as-a-Service – Results of an Action Design Research Project. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 617–631.1 indexed citations
3.
Herhausen, Dennis, et al.. (2019). Detecting, Preventing, and Mitigating Online Firestorms in Brand Communities. Journal of Marketing. 83(3). 1–21.253 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Dremel, Christian, et al.. (2018). Archetypes of Data Analytics Providers in the Big Data Era. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
5.
Dremel, Christian, et al.. (2017). Understanding the Value and Organizational Implications of Big Data Analytics – The Case of AUDI AG. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 38.1 indexed citations
6.
Dremel, Christian, Matthias M. Herterich, Jochen Wulf, J.-C. Waizmann, & Walter Brenner. (2017). How AUDI AG Established Big Data Analytics in its Digital Transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 16(2). 3.188 indexed citations
7.
Dremel, Christian, et al.. (2017). Actualizing Affordances: A Socio-Technical Perspective on Big Data Analytics in the Automotive Sector. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
8.
Wulf, Jochen, Tobias Mettler, & Walter Brenner. (2017). Using a Digital Services Capability Model to Assess Readiness for the Digital Consumer. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 16(3). 171–195.43 indexed citations
9.
Wulf, Jochen & Ivo Blohm. (2017). Service Innovation through Application Programming Interfaces - Towards a Typology of Service Designs. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.7 indexed citations
10.
Wulf, Jochen, et al.. (2016). A Socio-Technical Approach to Study Consumer-Centric Information Systems. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen).4 indexed citations
11.
Wulf, Jochen, et al.. (2015). Consumer-Centric Information Systems: A Literature Review and Avenues for Further Research. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen).3 indexed citations
12.
Wulf, Jochen, Till J. Winkler, & Walter Brenner. (2015). Measuring IT Service Management Capability: Scale Development and Empirical Validation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 630–644.13 indexed citations
13.
Wulf, Jochen, et al.. (2014). SUCCEEDING IN APPLICATION SERVICES OUTSOURCING STRATEGIES - A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
14.
Wulf, Jochen & Walter Brenner. (2013). Analyzing competitive effects between fixed and mobile broadband. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen).1 indexed citations
15.
Wulf, Jochen, et al.. (2013). The Varying Role of IS Capabilities for Different Approaches to Application Services Outsourcing. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen).3 indexed citations
16.
Wulf, Jochen, Till J. Winkler, & Walter Brenner. (2012). Organisationsgestaltung der Demand-IT. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 746–758.2 indexed citations
Wulf, Jochen, et al.. (2011). Economics of a Quality-of-Service interconnection market - A simulation-based analysis of a market scenario. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
19.
Cater‐Steel, Aileen, Rüdiger Zarnekow, & Jochen Wulf. (2011). IT SERVICE MANAGEMENT IN THE ACADEMIC CURRICULUM: COMPARING AN AUSTRALIAN AND GERMAN EXPERIENCE. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 33.2 indexed citations
20.
Wulf, Jochen, et al.. (2009). SPECIFYING ENABLING SERVICES IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE SYSTEMS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 36(9). 166–360.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.