Ivo Blohm

2.7k total citations
81 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Ivo Blohm is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Ivo Blohm has authored 81 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Computer Science Applications, 22 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 17 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Ivo Blohm's work include Open Source Software Innovations (38 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (17 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (16 papers). Ivo Blohm is often cited by papers focused on Open Source Software Innovations (38 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (17 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (16 papers). Ivo Blohm collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Ivo Blohm's co-authors include Jan Marco Leimeister, Helmut Krcmar, Ulrich Bretschneider, Jochen Wulf, Ali Sunyaev, Christoph Riedl, Christoph Peters, Dietmar Grichnik, Walter Brenner and Shkodran Zogaj and has published in prestigious journals such as Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A and Information Systems Research.

In The Last Decade

Ivo Blohm

72 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ivo Blohm Switzerland 19 611 427 256 245 243 81 1.7k
Andrew P. Ciganek United States 17 458 0.7× 425 1.0× 686 2.7× 167 0.7× 257 1.1× 36 1.9k
H. Joseph Wen United States 19 224 0.4× 380 0.9× 558 2.2× 142 0.6× 319 1.3× 53 1.9k
Babak Abedin Australia 23 148 0.2× 432 1.0× 164 0.6× 211 0.9× 186 0.8× 72 1.5k
Qinghua Zhu China 19 417 0.7× 845 2.0× 450 1.8× 345 1.4× 146 0.6× 64 2.0k
Aurora Garrido‐Moreno Spain 20 164 0.3× 535 1.3× 490 1.9× 159 0.6× 132 0.5× 26 1.8k
Derrick J. Neufeld Canada 15 257 0.4× 454 1.1× 289 1.1× 368 1.5× 186 0.8× 31 1.4k
Ángel Hernández-García Spain 18 728 1.2× 645 1.5× 460 1.8× 159 0.6× 53 0.2× 75 2.2k
Haya Ajjan United States 16 135 0.2× 753 1.8× 435 1.7× 286 1.2× 152 0.6× 34 1.6k
Muhammad Shujahat Hong Kong 16 276 0.5× 225 0.5× 116 0.5× 300 1.2× 104 0.4× 25 1.7k
Zhen Shao China 21 179 0.3× 768 1.8× 867 3.4× 278 1.1× 325 1.3× 44 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ivo Blohm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivo Blohm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivo Blohm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivo Blohm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivo Blohm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivo Blohm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivo Blohm. The network helps show where Ivo Blohm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ivo Blohm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ivo Blohm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ivo Blohm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ivo Blohm. Ivo Blohm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Blohm, Ivo, Shkodran Zogaj, Ulrich Bretschneider, & Jan Marco Leimeister. (2020). How to Manage Crowdsourcing Platforms Effectively. 12(1). 18–23. 3 indexed citations
2.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2018). Leveraging the Internal Work Force through Crowdtesting â Crowdsourcing in Banking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3 indexed citations
3.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2017). How to Design an Internal Crowdsourcing System. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 6 indexed citations
4.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2017). I am a Crowd Worker - How Individuals Identify with a New Form of Digital Work. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 3025. 2 indexed citations
5.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2017). The Rise of Crowd Aggregators - How Individual Workers Restructure Their Own Crowd. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 4 indexed citations
6.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2017). Blueprinting Crowdfunding - Designing a Crowdfunding Service Configuration Framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 4 indexed citations
7.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2017). Understanding the Emergence and Recombination of Distant Knowledge on Crowdsourcing Platforms. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 4 indexed citations
8.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2016). It's not about having Ideas - It's about making Ideas happen! Fostering Exploratory Innovation with the Intrapreneur Accelerator. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 2 indexed citations
9.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2015). Crowdfunding 2020: Komplement oder Substitut für die Finanzindustrie. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 1 indexed citations
10.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2015). How Idea Creativity and Hedonic Value Influence Project Success in Crowdfunding. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 948–962. 12 indexed citations
11.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2015). Crowdsourcing in Software Development: A State-of-the-Art Analysis. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 16. 8 indexed citations
12.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2014). An Empirical Taxonomy of Crowdfunding Intermediaries. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 71 indexed citations
13.
Blohm, Ivo, et al.. (2013). Crowdfunding-Studie 2013/14. Analysen, Perspektiven und Erfolgsfaktoren innovativer Unternehmens- und Projektfinanzierungen. Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen). 4 indexed citations
14.
Sunyaev, Ali, et al.. (2012). Determinants of Physicians’ Technology Acceptance for e-Health in Ambulatory Care. Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln). 1 indexed citations
15.
Blohm, Ivo, Christoph Riedl, Jan Marco Leimeister, & Helmut Krcmar. (2011). Idea Evaluation Mechanisms for Collective Intelligence in Open Innovation Communities: Do Traders Outperform Raters?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 29 indexed citations
16.
Sunyaev, Ali, et al.. (2010). Do German physicians want electronic health services. mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich). 1 indexed citations
17.
Sunyaev, Ali, et al.. (2010). Do German Physicians Want Electronic Health Services? A Characterization of Potential Adopters and Rejectors in German Ambulatory Care. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations
18.
Blohm, Ivo, Florian Ott, Ulrich Bretschneider, et al.. (2010). Extending Open Innovation Platforms into the real world - Using Large Displays in Public Spaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 109(7). 1374–81. 4 indexed citations
19.
Riedl, Christoph, Ivo Blohm, Jan Marco Leimeister, & Helmut Krcmar. (2010). RATING SCALES FOR COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE IN INNOVATION COMMUNITIES:WHY QUICK AND EASY DECISION MAKING DOES NOT GET IT RIGHT. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 52. 40 indexed citations
20.
Blohm, Ivo, Ulrich Bretschneider, Michael Huber, Jan Marco Leimeister, & Helmut Krcmar. (2009). Collaborative Filtering in Ideenwettbewerben: Evaluation zweier Skalen zur Teilnehmerbewertung. Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden). 365–377. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026