Joan Turner

891 citations
20 papers · 460 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Joan Turner

19 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Joan Turner
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Literature and Literary Theory 241
  • Language and Linguistics 127
  • Education 258
  • Linguistics and Language 37
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 15
Replace Stuart Greene with:
Stuart Greene United States
Kate Cadman Australia
Kate Chanock Australia
Gregory Hadley Japan
Linda Adler-Kassner United States
Katie Van Sluys United States
Russell Cross Australia
Judy Kalman Mexico
Richard Blot United States
Korina M. Jocson United States
Joan Turner relative to Stuart Greene United States Stuart Greene's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Stuart Greene · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Turner. The network helps show where Joan Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Joan Turner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan Turner Line = papers co-authored together Joan Turner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 201127
3 201022
4 201012
5 201026
6 200820
7 200459
8 20043
9 200313
10
Academic Literacy as Rhetorical Regulation
20031
11
L2 Pragmatics in Academic Discourse: A Case Study of Tutorials in Britain
20035
12
How to Study: A Short Introduction
20021
13 20022
14 200240
15 2001178
16 199617
17
What to Say Next? : The Sociopragamtic Problem of Elaboration for Japanese Students of English in Academic Contexts :
19953
18 19851
19 19817
20 198123

About Joan Turner

Joan Turner is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics, Public Administration, Education and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Second Language Learning and Teaching (6 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (5 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (241 citations), Language and Linguistics (127 citations), Education (258 citations), Linguistics and Language (37 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (15 citations). Joan Turner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Theresa Lillis, Richard P. Lipka, James A. Beane, Brian Street, Jan Blommaert, David Jones and David Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of English for Academic Purposes, Curriculum Inquiry, Midland History, Teaching in Higher Education and Studies in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026