Joan Rapaport

749 total citations
43 papers, 572 citations indexed

About

Joan Rapaport is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Joan Rapaport has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 572 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in General Health Professions, 22 papers in Education and 19 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Joan Rapaport's work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (21 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (14 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (12 papers). Joan Rapaport is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare innovation and challenges (21 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (14 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (12 papers). Joan Rapaport collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Joan Rapaport's co-authors include Jill Manthorpe, Kritika Samsi, Martin Stevens, J. John Harris, Vanessa Pinfold, Jo Moriarty, Shereen Hussein, Peter Huxley, Nicky Stanley and Mark Wilberforce and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, International Psychogeriatrics and Aging & Mental Health.

In The Last Decade

Joan Rapaport

43 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Joan Rapaport United Kingdom 14 322 239 232 171 106 43 572
Albert Banerjee Canada 11 374 1.2× 80 0.3× 114 0.5× 102 0.6× 168 1.6× 26 579
Stephen Martineau United Kingdom 10 234 0.7× 122 0.5× 200 0.9× 182 1.1× 66 0.6× 45 394
Housing Lin 8 195 0.6× 143 0.6× 192 0.8× 104 0.6× 66 0.6× 28 485
Suzy Braye United Kingdom 16 367 1.1× 175 0.7× 252 1.1× 137 0.8× 126 1.2× 49 727
Rachel Fyson United Kingdom 14 108 0.3× 155 0.6× 178 0.8× 149 0.9× 93 0.9× 41 425
James Gladstone Canada 16 242 0.8× 194 0.8× 65 0.3× 159 0.9× 297 2.8× 24 575
Michele Abendstern United Kingdom 14 415 1.3× 77 0.3× 142 0.6× 40 0.2× 99 0.9× 64 545
Caroline Norrie United Kingdom 10 189 0.6× 115 0.5× 141 0.6× 93 0.5× 44 0.4× 58 325
Katharine Hill United States 13 177 0.5× 279 1.2× 81 0.3× 36 0.2× 135 1.3× 30 549
Sally Mathiesen United States 13 240 0.7× 291 1.2× 78 0.3× 27 0.2× 140 1.3× 24 568

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Rapaport

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Rapaport's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Rapaport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Rapaport more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Rapaport

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Rapaport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Rapaport. The network helps show where Joan Rapaport may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joan Rapaport

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joan Rapaport. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joan Rapaport based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joan Rapaport. Joan Rapaport is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rapaport, Joan & Jill Manthorpe. (2017). Using practice research as a strategy for developing academic workforce capacity. Advances in Social Work. 19(1). 107–112. 2 indexed citations
2.
Rapaport, Joan. (2017). The Informal Caring Experience: Issues and Dilemmas. 171–186. 1 indexed citations
3.
Manthorpe, Jill, Kritika Samsi, & Joan Rapaport. (2013). “Capacity Is Key”: Investigating New Legal Provisions in England and Wales for Adult Safeguarding. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect. 25(4). 355–373. 7 indexed citations
4.
Manthorpe, Jill, Kritika Samsi, & Joan Rapaport. (2012). When the profession becomes personal: dementia care practitioners as family caregivers. International Psychogeriatrics. 24(6). 902–910. 10 indexed citations
5.
Manthorpe, Jill, Kritika Samsi, & Joan Rapaport. (2012). ‘More of a leg to stand on’: Views and usage of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 among staff of local Alzheimer's Society and carer organisations. Aging & Mental Health. 16(1). 102–109. 13 indexed citations
6.
Manthorpe, Jill, Kritika Samsi, & Joan Rapaport. (2012). Responding to the financial abuse of people with dementia: a qualitative study of safeguarding experiences in England. International Psychogeriatrics. 24(9). 1454–1464. 33 indexed citations
7.
Manthorpe, Jill, Kritika Samsi, & Joan Rapaport. (2012). Dementia nurses’ experience of the Mental Capacity Act 2005: A follow-up study. Dementia. 13(1). 131–143. 11 indexed citations
8.
Hussein, Shereen, Martin Stevens, Jill Manthorpe, et al.. (2009). Banned from working in social care: a secondary analysis of staff characteristics and reasons for their referrals to the POVA list in England and Wales. Health & Social Care in the Community. 17(5). 423–433. 22 indexed citations
9.
Hussein, Shereen, Stephen Martineau, Martin Stevens, et al.. (2009). Accusations of misconduct among staff working with vulnerable adults in England and Wales: their claims of mitigation to the barring authority. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 31(1). 17–32. 3 indexed citations
10.
Rapaport, Joan, Martin Stevens, Jill Manthorpe, et al.. (2008). Weighing the evidence: a case for using vignettes to elicit public and practitioner views of the workings of the POVA vetting and barring scheme. The Journal of Adult Protection. 10(2). 6–17. 9 indexed citations
11.
Slade, Mike, Vanessa Pinfold, Joan Rapaport, et al.. (2007). Best practice when service users do not consent to sharing information with carers. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 190(2). 148–155. 37 indexed citations
12.
Manthorpe, Jill, Michelle Cornes, Jo Moriarty, et al.. (2007). An inspector calls: adult protection in the context of the NSFOP review. The Journal of Adult Protection. 9(1). 4–14. 4 indexed citations
13.
Rapaport, Joan, et al.. (2006). Old issues and new directions. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. 10(2). 191–210. 15 indexed citations
14.
Rapaport, Joan, et al.. (2006). Carers and confidentiality in mental health care: considering the role of the carer's assessment: a study of service users', carers' and practitioners' views. Health & Social Care in the Community. 14(4). 357–365. 41 indexed citations
15.
Manthorpe, Jill, Michelle Cornes, Joan Rapaport, et al.. (2006). Commissioning Community Well‐Being: Focus on Older People and Transport. Journal of Integrated Care. 14(4). 28–37. 4 indexed citations
16.
Hussein, Shereen, et al.. (2006). Paying the piper and calling the tune?. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. 10(1). 75–91. 9 indexed citations
18.
Rapaport, Joan. (2005). Policy Swings Over Thirty-Five Years of Mental Health Social Work in England and Wales 1969–2004. Practice. 17(1). 43–56. 6 indexed citations
19.
Rapaport, Joan. (2004). A Matter of Principle: the Nearest Relative under the Mental Health Act 1983 and Proposals for Legislative Reform. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 26(4). 377–396. 11 indexed citations
20.
Rapaport, Joan. (1996). Confidentiality and mental health care. Practice Nursing. 7(6). 12–14. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026