Michelle Shum

12 papers receiving 393 citations

Hit Papers

Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challen...2020202620222024202050100150

Peers

Michelle Shum
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • General Health Professions 185
  • Clinical Psychology 160
  • Public Administration 138
  • Sociology and Political Science 129
  • Health 44
Replace Steven Shardlow with:
Steven Shardlow United Kingdom
Karen Kay Kirst-Ashman
Waldo C. Klein United States
Linnea F. GlenMaye United States
Hsin‐Yi Hsiao United States
Ira Malmberg‐Heimonen Norway
León Ginsberg United States
Elizabeth Harlow United Kingdom
Jane Maidment Australia
Kimberly Strom‐Gottfried United States
Michelle Shum relative to Steven Shardlow United Kingdom Steven Shardlow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Steven Shardlow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Shum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Shum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Shum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Shum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Shum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Shum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Shum. The network helps show where Michelle Shum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle Shum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle Shum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle Shum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle Shum. Michelle Shum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 0
5 5
6 15
7 4
8 0
9 4
10 8
11
Ethical challenges for social workers during Covid-19: A global perspective
42
12
Practising ethically during COVID-19: Social work challenges and responsesbreakdown →
196
13
Practising During Pandemic Conditions : Ethical Guidance for Social Workers
5
14 20
15 40
16 76

About Michelle Shum

Michelle Shum is a scholar working on Public Administration, Clinical Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 16 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (6 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (138 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations) and Clinical Psychology (160 citations). Michelle Shum has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ana M. Sobočan, María Jesús Úriz Pemán, Ed de Jonge, Jane Shears, Sarah Banks, Merlinda Weinberg, Tian Cai, Rory Truell, Terry Yat Sang Lum and Andy Hau Yan Ho. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BMC Health Services Research and Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026