Joachim Van den Bergh

19 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Joachim Van den Bergh
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Management Information Systems 226
  • Strategy and Management 115
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 60
  • Media Technology 58
  • Sociology and Political Science 50
Replace Sinéad Roden with:
Sinéad Roden United Kingdom
Konrad Peszynski Australia
Marlen Jurisch Germany
Diane Poulin Canada
Katarina Tomičić-Pupek Croatia
Björn Hildebrandt Germany
Sven‐Volker Rehm Germany
Martina Tomičić Furjan Croatia
Lapo Mola Italy
John F. Affisco United States
Joachim Van den Bergh relative to Sinéad Roden United Kingdom Sinéad Roden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sinéad Roden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Van den Bergh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Van den Bergh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Van den Bergh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Van den Bergh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Van den Bergh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Van den Bergh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Van den Bergh. The network helps show where Joachim Van den Bergh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joachim Van den Bergh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joachim Van den Bergh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joachim Van den Bergh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joachim Van den Bergh. Joachim Van den Bergh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 31
3 29
4
Re-positioning business process management
1
5 21
6 29
7 2
8 30
9
The growth path towards the process-oriented organization
0
10 13
11 8
12 9
13
How BPM Impacts Jobs: An Exploratory Field Study
1
14 15
15 3
16
BPM - Quo Vadis?
2
17 154
18
The process-oriented organisation: a holistic view: developing a framework for business process orientation maturity
30
19
BPO at a Belgian energy distributor
1
20 41

About Joachim Van den Bergh

Joachim Van den Bergh is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation and Media Technology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (10 papers), Smart Cities and Technologies (4 papers) and Collaboration in agile enterprises (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (226 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (60 citations) and Strategy and Management (115 citations). Joachim Van den Bergh has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Slovenia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Stijn Viaene, Jürgen Willems, Dirk Deschoolmeester, Patrick De Pelsmacker, Kevin McCormack, Marcelo Bronzo Ladeira, Peter Trkman, Marcos Paulo Valadares de Oliveira, Willem Mertens and Öykü Işık. Their work appears in journals such as Government Information Quarterly, Business Process Management Journal and Journal of International Consumer Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026