Business Process Management Journal

1.6k papers and 39.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Business Process Management Journal in the last decades have received a total of 39.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Business Process Management Journal usually cover Management Information Systems (1.0k papers), Strategy and Management (665 papers) and Information Systems (205 papers) specifically the topics of Business Process Modeling and Analysis (474 papers), Quality and Supply Management (316 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (264 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Business Process Management Journal are Injazz J. Chen, Mohamed Zairi, Jiju Antony, Adel M. Aladwani, Mohd. Nishat Faisal, Angelo Ditillo, Karen Popovich, Samuel Fosso Wamba, Zahir Irani and Dag Näslund.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Business Process Management Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Business Process Management Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Business Process Management Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Business Process Management Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Business Process Management Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Business Process Management Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Business Process Management Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025