Joachim de Greeff
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Control and Systems Engineering top 10%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Tony BelpaemeAnthony MorseAngelo CangelosiMark A. NeerincxIvana Kruijff‐KorbayováKoen V. HindriksPaul BaxterRosemarijn Looije
- Topics
- Social Robot Interaction and HRI (8 papers)AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (6 papers)Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEKI - Künstliche Intelligenz
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Joachim de Greeff
24 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Social Psychology 167
- Artificial Intelligence 134
- Control and Systems Engineering 75
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 69
- Cognitive Neuroscience 58
Countries citing papers authored by Joachim de Greeff
This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim de Greeff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim de Greeff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim de Greeff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim de Greeff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim de Greeff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim de Greeff. The network helps show where Joachim de Greeff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joachim de Greeff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joachim de Greeff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joachim de Greeff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joachim de Greeff. Joachim de Greeff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | The FATE System: FAir, Transparent and Explainable Decision Making. | 6 |
| 3 | Hybrid ai: White paper | 1 |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | Activity switching in child-robot interaction: a hospital case study | 4 |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 54 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Joachim de Greeff
Joachim de Greeff is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Social Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 26 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (8 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (6 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (48 citations), Social Psychology (167 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (134 citations). Joachim de Greeff has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Tony Belpaeme, Anthony Morse, Angelo Cangelosi, Mark A. Neerincx, Ivana Kruijff‐Korbayová, Koen V. Hindriks, Paul Baxter, Rosemarijn Looije, Mario Gianni and Francis Colas. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.