Jill M. Sutton

613 total citations
17 papers, 348 citations indexed

About

Jill M. Sutton is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gender Studies and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Jill M. Sutton has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 348 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in Gender Studies and 2 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Jill M. Sutton's work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (7 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers). Jill M. Sutton is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (7 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (2 papers). Jill M. Sutton collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Jill M. Sutton's co-authors include James W. Griffith, Richard E. Zinbarg, Michelle G. Craske, Susan Mineka, Allison M. Waters, Helen Morgan, Celeste S. Royce, Elise Everett, Susan M. Cox and Scott Graziano and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Psychological Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Jill M. Sutton

14 papers receiving 336 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jill M. Sutton United States 7 190 150 59 52 32 17 348
Natasha Chaku United States 9 123 0.6× 82 0.5× 52 0.9× 57 1.1× 24 0.8× 26 369
Jessica A. Keith United States 11 220 1.2× 57 0.4× 60 1.0× 44 0.8× 36 1.1× 15 325
Beatriz Rodríguez Vega Spain 12 251 1.3× 56 0.4× 94 1.6× 53 1.0× 43 1.3× 53 399
Sarah Krill Williston United States 9 321 1.7× 123 0.8× 114 1.9× 19 0.4× 44 1.4× 12 409
Matt S. Treeby Australia 11 190 1.0× 86 0.6× 149 2.5× 19 0.4× 36 1.1× 16 334
Gaia de Campora Italy 6 281 1.5× 116 0.8× 94 1.6× 46 0.9× 15 0.5× 18 366
Riadh Abed United Kingdom 10 214 1.1× 135 0.9× 84 1.4× 38 0.7× 65 2.0× 35 414
Laura Celebre Italy 10 266 1.4× 85 0.6× 53 0.9× 67 1.3× 14 0.4× 20 345
Kirsten M.P. McKone United States 10 162 0.9× 70 0.5× 70 1.2× 47 0.9× 19 0.6× 19 305
Khadj Rouf United Kingdom 6 213 1.1× 140 0.9× 48 0.8× 20 0.4× 26 0.8× 13 391

Countries citing papers authored by Jill M. Sutton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill M. Sutton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill M. Sutton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill M. Sutton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill M. Sutton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill M. Sutton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill M. Sutton. The network helps show where Jill M. Sutton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill M. Sutton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill M. Sutton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill M. Sutton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jill M. Sutton. Jill M. Sutton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Chen, Katherine T., Helen Morgan, Celeste S. Royce, et al.. (2025). Practical applications of artificial intelligence chatbots in obstetrics and gynecology medical education. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 233(1). 4–11.
2.
Chen, Katherine T., Celeste S. Royce, Helen Morgan, et al.. (2024). Changes and challenges in the residency application process in obstetrics and gynecology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 231(5). 475–479. 1 indexed citations
3.
Morgan, Helen, Katherine T. Chen, Jonathan Schaffir, et al.. (2024). Under pressure: Supporting academic faculty in demanding times. Medical Teacher. 47(4). 575–579.
4.
Chen, Katherine T., Celeste S. Royce, Jonathan Schaffir, et al.. (2023). Current practices and perspectives on clerkship grading in obstetrics and gynecology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 230(1). 97.e1–97.e6. 4 indexed citations
5.
Schaffir, Jonathan, Helen Morgan, Katherine T. Chen, et al.. (2023). To the Point: optimizing the learning environment in labor and delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM. 5(9). 101090–101090.
6.
Morgan, Helen, Susan M. Cox, Elise Everett, et al.. (2023). Obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors’ experiences advising residency applicants. AJOG Global Reports. 3(4). 100268–100268. 1 indexed citations
7.
Sutton, Jill M., Katherine T. Chen, Helen Morgan, et al.. (2023). Strategies to Create a More Gender Identity Inclusive Learning Environment in Preclinical and Clinical Medical Education. Academic Medicine. 98(12). 1351–1355. 4 indexed citations
8.
Cox, Susan M., Elise Everett, Scott Graziano, et al.. (2023). Clerkship director confidence in medical student career advising in obstetrics and gynecology. AJOG Global Reports. 3(2). 100187–100187. 2 indexed citations
9.
Sutton, Jill M., et al.. (2023). Laboratory Response to Pandemic Threats: Challenges, Needs, and Solutions. Health Security. 21(1_suppl). S56–S59. 3 indexed citations
10.
Royce, Celeste S., Helen Morgan, Susan M. Cox, et al.. (2022). The time is now: addressing implicit bias in obstetrics and gynecology education. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 228(4). 369–381. 13 indexed citations
11.
Stephenson‐Famy, Alyssa, Katherine T. Chen, Helen Morgan, et al.. (2022). The Dobbs Decision and Undergraduate Medical Education: The Unintended Consequences and Strategies to Optimize Reproductive Health and a Competent Workforce for the Future. Academic Medicine. 98(4). 431–435. 15 indexed citations
12.
Cox, Susan M., Elise Everett, David A. Forstein, et al.. (2022). Enhancing interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education in women’s health. Medical Education Online. 27(1). 2107419–2107419. 6 indexed citations
13.
Morgenstern, Bruce Z., Brenda Roman, Deborah DeWaay, et al.. (2021). Expectations of and for Clerkship Directors 2.0: A Collaborative Statement from the Alliance for Clinical Education. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 33(4). 343–354. 8 indexed citations
14.
Cox, Susan M., Elise Everett, Scott Graziano, et al.. (2020). Medical Education and Safety as Co-priorities in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Era. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 136(4). 830–834. 9 indexed citations
15.
Sutton, Jill M., et al.. (2020). Improving Learners' Comfort With Cesarean Sections Through the Use of High-Fidelity, Low-Cost Simulation. MedEdPORTAL. 16. 10878–10878. 6 indexed citations
16.
Griffith, James W., Richard E. Zinbarg, Michelle G. Craske, et al.. (2009). Neuroticism as a common dimension in the internalizing disorders. Psychological Medicine. 40(7). 1125–1136. 266 indexed citations
17.
Schonberg, S. Kenneth, R. K. Beach, Richard R. Brookman, et al.. (1989). Screening for drugs of abuse in children and adolescents. 84(2). 396–398. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026