Gaia de Campora

471 total citations
18 papers, 366 citations indexed

About

Gaia de Campora is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Gaia de Campora has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Clinical Psychology, 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 4 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Gaia de Campora's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (4 papers). Gaia de Campora is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (6 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (4 papers). Gaia de Campora collaborates with scholars based in Italy and United States. Gaia de Campora's co-authors include Luciano Giromini, Giulio Cesare Zavattini, Patrizia Velotti, Laura Bonalume, Alessandro Zennaro, Claudia Pignolo, G. Larciprete, Carlo Garofalo, Simona Di Folco and Giuseppe Di Pierro and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Appetite and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Gaia de Campora

17 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gaia de Campora Italy 6 281 116 94 59 46 18 366
Laura Bonalume Italy 6 323 1.1× 143 1.2× 87 0.9× 57 1.0× 19 0.4× 11 413
Usha Barahmand Iran 12 244 0.9× 120 1.0× 69 0.7× 55 0.9× 27 0.6× 49 385
Marie‐Lotte Van Beveren Belgium 11 303 1.1× 131 1.1× 108 1.1× 43 0.7× 34 0.7× 20 385
Diego Sarracino Italy 10 218 0.8× 64 0.6× 91 1.0× 49 0.8× 45 1.0× 23 301
Pamela M. Seeds Canada 5 344 1.2× 245 2.1× 111 1.2× 40 0.7× 39 0.8× 6 461
Stefania Muzi Italy 11 299 1.1× 52 0.4× 108 1.1× 58 1.0× 35 0.8× 34 378
Helen Pote United Kingdom 11 217 0.8× 49 0.4× 104 1.1× 35 0.6× 39 0.8× 26 326
Sarah Krill Williston United States 9 321 1.1× 123 1.1× 114 1.2× 36 0.6× 19 0.4× 12 409
Lori V. Turner United States 4 322 1.1× 67 0.6× 102 1.1× 44 0.7× 61 1.3× 4 408
Michelle Haslam United Kingdom 6 310 1.1× 66 0.6× 74 0.8× 57 1.0× 30 0.7× 7 361

Countries citing papers authored by Gaia de Campora

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gaia de Campora's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gaia de Campora with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gaia de Campora more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gaia de Campora

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gaia de Campora. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gaia de Campora. The network helps show where Gaia de Campora may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gaia de Campora

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gaia de Campora. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gaia de Campora based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gaia de Campora. Gaia de Campora is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2019). Influence of maternal reflective functioning on mothers’ and children's weight: A follow‐up study. Infant Mental Health Journal. 40(6). 862–873. 2 indexed citations
2.
Giromini, Luciano, et al.. (2017). Developing Age and Gender Adjusted Normative Reference Values for the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 39(4). 705–714. 44 indexed citations
3.
Valli, E, et al.. (2017). Unusual Ectopic Pregnancy: Beyond the Tubes. Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University). 1. 12–22. 2 indexed citations
4.
Lucarelli, Loredana, Gaia de Campora, & Cristina Sechi. (2016). Maternal mental health status and temperamental traits of the baby: reciprocal influences and effects on the quality of feeding interactions. UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari). 37. 363–364. 1 indexed citations
5.
Folco, Simona Di, Gaia de Campora, & Giulio Cesare Zavattini. (2016). Sintonie e dissintonie nei legami precoci: traiettorie di valutazione e considerazioni cliniche nei contesti ad alto rischio per lo sviluppo infantile. IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome). 71–93. 4 indexed citations
6.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2015). A longitudinal study on emotional dysregulation and obesity risk: From pregnancy to 3 years of age of the baby. Appetite. 96. 95–101. 12 indexed citations
7.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2015). Emotions During Pregnancy: Do They Protect From the Risk of Dysregulated Eating Behaviors?. European Psychiatry. 30. 1337–1337. 1 indexed citations
8.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2015). Quando la relazione non funziona: il maltrattamento su bambini con Disturbo dello Spettro Autistico. Una revisione della letteratura. IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome). 55–83. 1 indexed citations
9.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2015). Am I Angry or Hungry? Emotion Dysregulation Routes On the Onset of Overweight in Childhood.. European Psychiatry. 30. 1338–1338. 1 indexed citations
10.
Folco, Simona Di, et al.. (2015). Skin to skin interactions. Does the infant massage improve the couple functioning?. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 1468–1468. 3 indexed citations
11.
Velotti, Patrizia, et al.. (2015). Gender moderates the relationship between attachment insecurities and emotion dysregulation. South African Journal of Psychology. 46(2). 191–202. 16 indexed citations
12.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2015). Childhood overweight and obesity: extending the knowledge through the lens of the emotion regulation paradigm. Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin). 169–178. 1 indexed citations
13.
Campora, Gaia de & Luciano Giromini. (2015). Excessive food intake and emotion dysregulation.. 157–168. 2 indexed citations
14.
Giromini, Luciano, et al.. (2015). Validity and Reliability of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire: Empirical Evidence from an Italian Study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 38(1). 113–123. 25 indexed citations
15.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2014). Fattori di rischio precoci nello sviluppo del sovrappeso in eta pediatrica. Una rassegna della letteratura. Giornale italiano di psicologia. 265–294. 2 indexed citations
16.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2014). Indexes of psychopathology risk in gestational overweight. Giornale italiano di psicologia. 601–610. 1 indexed citations
17.
Campora, Gaia de, et al.. (2014). The impact of maternal overweight and emotion regulation on early eating behaviors. Eating Behaviors. 15(3). 403–409. 15 indexed citations
18.
Giromini, Luciano, Patrizia Velotti, Gaia de Campora, Laura Bonalume, & Giulio Cesare Zavattini. (2012). Cultural Adaptation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: Reliability and Validity of an Italian Version. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 68(9). 989–1007. 233 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026