Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Jill K. Jesson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jill K. Jesson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill K. Jesson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill K. Jesson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill K. Jesson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill K. Jesson. The network helps show where Jill K. Jesson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jill K. Jesson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jill K. Jesson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jill K. Jesson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jill K. Jesson. Jill K. Jesson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jesson, Jill K., et al.. (2011). The Really Useful ICT Book: A practical guide to using technology across the primary curriculum.1 indexed citations
2.
Langley, Chris, Jill K. Jesson, & Keith Wilson. (2010). Choosing to study pharmacy: measuring influences and motivations. Pharmacy Education. 10(2). 79–84.7 indexed citations
3.
Jesson, Jill K., Chris Langley, & Keith Wilson. (2009). Factors influencing students in choosing to study pharmacy in Great Britain. Pharmaceutical journal/The pharmaceutical journal. 282(7557). 750–753.2 indexed citations
4.
Jesson, Jill K. & Ian R. Stone. (2009). A review of barriers to kerbside recycling household waste in the UK. Aston Publications Explorer (Aston University).7 indexed citations
5.
Jesson, Jill K., et al.. (2008). Images of pharmacy as a career: a survey among groups of year 12 students at school. Pharmaceutical journal/The pharmaceutical journal. 280(7489). 183–184.4 indexed citations
6.
Jesson, Jill K., et al.. (2008). Constraints, barriers or just plain excuses.1 indexed citations
7.
Jesson, Jill K.. (2007). Creating demand for better health by using social marketing techniques. Pharmaceutical journal/The pharmaceutical journal. 278. 776–777.4 indexed citations
8.
Jesson, Jill K., et al.. (2006). A career in pharmacy: a new approach to measuring the motivations of pharmacy students. Pharmacy Education. 6(3).1 indexed citations
Jesson, Jill K., et al.. (2002). Primary care prescribing. Hard to swallow.. PubMed. 112(5826). 28–9.2 indexed citations
15.
Wilson, Keith, et al.. (2002). The Birmingham community pharmacy repeat dispensing project. Pharmaceutical journal/The pharmaceutical journal. 269(7205). 20–24.6 indexed citations
16.
Bissell, Paul & Jill K. Jesson. (2002). Health inequalities - a neglected area of pharmacy policy and practice. Pharmaceutical journal/The pharmaceutical journal. 269(7227). 819–821.3 indexed citations
Jesson, Jill K., Alison Blenkinsopp, Helen Boardman, & Keith Wilson. (2001). A pharmacy workforce survey in the West Midlands: 3 primary care pharmacists. Pharmaceutical journal/The pharmaceutical journal. 266(7148). 684–687.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.