Helen Boardman

2.3k citations
49 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Helen Boardman

49 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Helen Boardman
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 350
  • Family Practice 140
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 448
  • Medical Terminology 8
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 331
Replace Dag Isacson with:
Dag Isacson Sweden
Arne Fetveit Norway
Suzanne Nielsen Australia
Andrea Mant Australia
Riitta Ahonen Finland
Wim Stalman Netherlands
Tracy L. Skaer United States
Sunny A. Linnebur United States
Luz M. León‐Muñoz Spain
Simon Coulton United Kingdom
Helen Boardman relative to Dag Isacson Sweden Dag Isacson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Dag Isacson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Boardman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Boardman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Boardman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Boardman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Boardman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Boardman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Boardman. The network helps show where Helen Boardman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Helen Boardman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Helen Boardman Line = papers co-authored together Helen Boardman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20212
3 2020148
4 201529
5 201417
6 20144
7 201332
8 201318
9 201326
10 201342
11 201211
12 201168
13 200848
14 20055
15 20059
16 200557
17 200598
18 200112
19
A pharmacy workforce survey in the West Midlands: 3 primary care pharmacists
20013
20 200123

About Helen Boardman

Helen Boardman is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and General Health Professions, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (20 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (9 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (350 citations), Family Practice (140 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (448 citations), Medical Terminology (8 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (331 citations). Helen Boardman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Thailand and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Croft, Kate M. Dunn, Martyn Lewis, Dawn‐Marie Walker, Mayuree Tangkiatkumjai, Asam Latif, David Millson, Elaine Thomas, Kristian Pollock and Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, Cephalalgia, International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Journal of Public Health and BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026