Jens Siewert

2.3k total citations
63 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Jens Siewert is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jens Siewert has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 42 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 13 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Jens Siewert's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (42 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (37 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (26 papers). Jens Siewert is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (42 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (37 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Applications (26 papers). Jens Siewert collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Italy. Jens Siewert's co-authors include Christopher Eltschka, Andreas Osterloh, Norbert Schuch, Rosario Fazio, Armin Uhlmann, Otfried Gühne, Lara Faoro, Felix Huber, Robert Lohmayer and G. Falci and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review B.

In The Last Decade

Jens Siewert

61 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jens Siewert Germany 23 1.4k 1.4k 119 67 65 63 1.7k
Sandeep K. Goyal India 18 1.1k 0.8× 509 0.4× 47 0.4× 101 1.5× 43 0.7× 47 1.3k
A.S. Shumovsky Russia 17 1.2k 0.9× 995 0.7× 64 0.5× 45 0.7× 17 0.3× 118 1.3k
Andrea Alberti Germany 21 1.1k 0.8× 638 0.5× 27 0.2× 41 0.6× 87 1.3× 31 1.3k
M. W. Kalinowski Poland 12 755 0.5× 381 0.3× 192 1.6× 56 0.8× 32 0.5× 58 1.1k
Christine Maier Austria 15 1.7k 1.2× 1.1k 0.8× 177 1.5× 101 1.5× 34 0.5× 22 1.9k
Bruno Juliá-Díaz Spain 27 1.2k 0.8× 446 0.3× 181 1.5× 22 0.3× 13 0.2× 108 2.0k
M. S. Sarandy Brazil 28 2.8k 1.9× 2.5k 1.8× 198 1.7× 36 0.5× 48 0.7× 66 3.2k
S. Whitlock Germany 22 1.5k 1.0× 486 0.4× 170 1.4× 35 0.5× 9 0.1× 49 1.5k
Ruben Verresen United States 21 1.6k 1.1× 514 0.4× 642 5.4× 44 0.7× 44 0.7× 36 1.8k
Dominic V. Else United States 14 1.4k 1.0× 318 0.2× 369 3.1× 27 0.4× 15 0.2× 26 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Jens Siewert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jens Siewert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jens Siewert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jens Siewert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jens Siewert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jens Siewert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jens Siewert. The network helps show where Jens Siewert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jens Siewert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jens Siewert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jens Siewert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jens Siewert. Jens Siewert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Winkelmann, Clemens B., et al.. (2024). Interplay of Andreev Reflection and Coulomb Blockade in Hybrid Superconducting Single-Electron Transistors. Physical Review Letters. 132(5). 57001–57001. 2 indexed citations
2.
Eltschka, Christopher, et al.. (2024). Correlation constraints and the Bloch geometry of two qubits. Physical review. A. 109(1). 3 indexed citations
3.
Klöckl, Claude, et al.. (2019). Dimensionally sharp inequalities for the linear entropy. Linear Algebra and its Applications. 584. 294–325. 8 indexed citations
4.
Sentís, Gael, et al.. (2018). Bound entangled states fit for robust experimental verification. Quantum. 2. 113–113. 16 indexed citations
5.
Huber, Felix, Otfried Gühne, & Jens Siewert. (2017). Absolutely Maximally Entangled States of Seven Qubits Do Not Exist. Physical Review Letters. 118(20). 200502–200502. 68 indexed citations
6.
Sentís, Gael, Christopher Eltschka, Otfried Gühne, Marcus Huber, & Jens Siewert. (2016). Quantifying Entanglement of Maximal Dimension in Bipartite Mixed States. Physical Review Letters. 117(19). 190502–190502. 18 indexed citations
7.
Eltschka, Christopher & Jens Siewert. (2015). Monogamy Equalities for Qubit Entanglement from Lorentz Invariance. Physical Review Letters. 114(14). 140402–140402. 33 indexed citations
8.
Eltschka, Christopher & Jens Siewert. (2014). Practical method to obtain a lower bound to the three-tangle. Physical Review A. 89(2). 14 indexed citations
9.
Eltschka, Christopher & Jens Siewert. (2013). Optimal class-specific witnesses for three-qubit entanglement from Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger symmetry. Quantum Information and Computation. 13(3&4). 210–220. 4 indexed citations
10.
Siewert, Jens & Christopher Eltschka. (2012). Quantifying Tripartite Entanglement of Three-Qubit Generalized Werner States. Physical Review Letters. 108(23). 230502–230502. 44 indexed citations
11.
Eltschka, Christopher & Jens Siewert. (2012). Entanglement of Three-Qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger–Symmetric States. Physical Review Letters. 108(2). 20502–20502. 84 indexed citations
12.
Eltschka, Christopher, Andreas Osterloh, & Jens Siewert. (2009). Possibility of generalized monogamy relations for multipartite entanglement beyond three qubits. Physical Review A. 80(3). 20 indexed citations
13.
Siewert, Jens, Tobias Brandes, & G. Falci. (2009). Advanced control with a Cooper-pair box: Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage and Fock-state generation in a nanomechanical resonator. Physical Review B. 79(2). 30 indexed citations
14.
Ferlito, Carmelo & Jens Siewert. (2006). Lava Channel Formation during the 2001 Eruption on Mount Etna: Evidence for Mechanical Erosion. Physical Review Letters. 96(2). 28501–28501. 21 indexed citations
15.
Lohmayer, Robert, Andreas Osterloh, Jens Siewert, & Armin Uhlmann. (2006). Entangled Three-Qubit States without Concurrence and Three-Tangle. Physical Review Letters. 97(26). 260502–260502. 137 indexed citations
16.
Osterloh, Andreas & Jens Siewert. (2005). Constructing N-qubit entanglement monotones from antilinear operators (4 pages). Physical Review A. 72(1). 12337. 8 indexed citations
17.
Schuch, Norbert & Jens Siewert. (2003). Programmable Networks for Quantum Algorithms. Physical Review Letters. 91(2). 27902–27902. 29 indexed citations
18.
Siewert, Jens & Rosario Fazio. (2001). Quantum Algorithms for Josephson Networks. Physical Review Letters. 87(25). 257905–257905. 33 indexed citations
19.
Bauernschmitt, Rüdiger, Jens Siewert, Yuli V. Nazarov, & A. A. Odintsov. (1994). Josephson effect in low-capacitance superconductor–normal-metal–superconductor systems. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 49(6). 4076–4081. 22 indexed citations
20.
Flach, Sergej, Jens Siewert, R. Siems, & J. Schreiber. (1991). A study of long time correlations in finite Φ4-SYSTEMS (d=1,2) BY use of molecular dynamics. Ferroelectrics. 124(1). 173–178. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026