Titus Morris

2.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
20 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Titus Morris is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Titus Morris has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 10 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Titus Morris's work include Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (8 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers). Titus Morris is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (8 papers) and Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers). Titus Morris collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Germany. Titus Morris's co-authors include G. Hagen, T. Papenbrock, Pavel Lougovski, G. R. Jansen, Raphael C. Pooser, Alex McCaskey, Eugene Dumitrescu, S. K. Bogner, Martin J. Savage and Natalie Klco and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Physics and Physical review. A.

In The Last Decade

Titus Morris

20 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 2019 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Titus Morris United States 11 743 737 477 158 68 20 1.3k
Alessandro Roggero United States 19 536 0.7× 410 0.6× 380 0.8× 49 0.3× 34 0.5× 42 930
Natalie Klco United States 13 1.0k 1.4× 497 0.7× 727 1.5× 43 0.3× 160 2.4× 23 1.4k
Heiko Bauke Germany 19 727 1.0× 375 0.5× 79 0.2× 64 0.4× 55 0.8× 36 914
D. Galetti Brazil 14 626 0.8× 385 0.5× 239 0.5× 57 0.4× 45 0.7× 53 906
Gary R. Goldstein United States 25 223 0.3× 1.4k 1.9× 97 0.2× 124 0.8× 50 0.7× 116 1.7k
Cong‐Feng Qiao China 27 437 0.6× 1.8k 2.4× 383 0.8× 31 0.2× 48 0.7× 169 2.3k
Zohreh Davoudi United States 26 618 0.8× 1.3k 1.8× 328 0.7× 20 0.1× 134 2.0× 47 1.8k
J. R. Torgerson United States 11 551 0.7× 138 0.2× 136 0.3× 36 0.2× 14 0.2× 25 723
Kristina D. Launey United States 18 577 0.8× 869 1.2× 59 0.1× 317 2.0× 37 0.5× 73 1.1k
Bruno Juliá-Díaz Spain 27 1.2k 1.6× 805 1.1× 446 0.9× 59 0.4× 181 2.7× 108 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Titus Morris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Titus Morris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Titus Morris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Titus Morris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Titus Morris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Titus Morris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Titus Morris. The network helps show where Titus Morris may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Titus Morris

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Titus Morris. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Titus Morris based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Titus Morris. Titus Morris is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stroberg, S. R., et al.. (2024). In-medium similarity renormalization group with flowing 3-body operators, and approximations thereof. Physical review. C. 110(4). 7 indexed citations
2.
Yale, Christopher G., et al.. (2023). Characterizing and mitigating coherent errors in a trapped ion quantum processor using hidden inverses. Quantum. 7. 1006–1006. 4 indexed citations
3.
Goings, Joshua J., et al.. (2023). Molecular Symmetry in VQE: A Dual Approach for Trapped-Ion Simulations of Benzene. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 76–82. 4 indexed citations
4.
Novario, S. J., Peter Gysbers, J. Engel, et al.. (2021). Coupled-Cluster Calculations of Neutrinoless Double-β Decay in Ca48. Physical Review Letters. 126(18). 47 indexed citations
5.
Morris, Titus. (2019). Improved optimization algorithm for use in variational quantum eigensolvers. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2019. 1 indexed citations
6.
Gysbers, Peter, G. Hagen, J. D. Holt, et al.. (2019). Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical β-decay rates resolved from first principles. Nature Physics. 15(5). 428–431. 199 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Lu, Hsuan‐Hao, Natalie Klco, Joseph M. Lukens, et al.. (2019). Simulations of subatomic many-body physics on a quantum frequency processor. Physical review. A. 100(1). 89 indexed citations
8.
Lu, Hsuan‐Hao, Natalie Klco, Joseph M. Lukens, et al.. (2019). Subatomic Many-Body Physics Simulations on a Quantum Frequency Processor. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 4. FTh3A.6–FTh3A.6. 2 indexed citations
9.
Klco, Natalie, Eugene Dumitrescu, Alex McCaskey, et al.. (2018). Quantum-Classical Dynamical Calculations of the Schwinger Model using Quantum Computers. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
10.
Dumitrescu, Eugene, Alex McCaskey, G. Hagen, et al.. (2018). Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus. Physical Review Letters. 120(21). 210501–210501. 251 indexed citations
11.
Morris, Titus, J. Simonis, S. R. Stroberg, et al.. (2018). Structure of the Lightest Tin Isotopes. Physical Review Letters. 120(15). 152503–152503. 118 indexed citations
12.
Klco, Natalie, Eugene Dumitrescu, Alex McCaskey, et al.. (2018). Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers. Physical review. A. 98(3). 296 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Sun, Z. H., Titus Morris, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, & T. Papenbrock. (2018). Shell-model coupled-cluster method for open-shell nuclei. Physical review. C. 98(5). 23 indexed citations
14.
Ekström, A., et al.. (2018). Δ isobars and nuclear saturation. Physical review. C. 97(2). 63 indexed citations
15.
Hergert, H., et al.. (2018). Nuclear Structure from the In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1041. 12007–12007. 9 indexed citations
16.
Morris, Titus, et al.. (2017). Ab initioexcited states from the in-medium similarity renormalization group. Physical review. C. 95(4). 14 indexed citations
17.
Morris, Titus. (2016). SYSTEMATIC IMPROVEMENTS OF AB-INITIO IN-MEDIUM SIMILARITY RENORMALIZATION GROUP CALCULATIONS. Michigan State University Libraries. 8 indexed citations
18.
Morris, Titus, et al.. (2015). Magnus expansion and in-medium similarity renormalization group. Physical Review C. 92(3). 73 indexed citations
19.
Hergert, H., S. K. Bogner, Titus Morris, et al.. (2014). Ab initiomultireference in-medium similarity renormalization group calculations of even calcium and nickel isotopes. Physical Review C. 90(4). 94 indexed citations
20.
Morris, Titus & S. K. Bogner. (2014). The Magnus expansion and the in-medium similarity renormalization group. AIP conference proceedings. 1620. 117–125. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026