Norbert Schuch

7.1k total citations · 2 hit papers
96 papers, 4.4k citations indexed

About

Norbert Schuch is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Condensed Matter Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Norbert Schuch has authored 96 papers receiving a total of 4.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 94 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 38 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 34 papers in Condensed Matter Physics. Recurrent topics in Norbert Schuch's work include Quantum many-body systems (81 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (48 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (32 papers). Norbert Schuch is often cited by papers focused on Quantum many-body systems (81 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (48 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (32 papers). Norbert Schuch collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United States. Norbert Schuch's co-authors include J. I. Cirac, Frank Verstraete, David Pérez-Garcı́a, Didier Poilblanc, Michael M. Wolf, Jens Siewert, Jutho Haegeman, Christina V. Kraus, Jens Eisert and Thorsten B. Wahl and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Reviews of Modern Physics.

In The Last Decade

Norbert Schuch

93 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Hit Papers

Classifying quantum phases using matrix product states an... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 2021 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Norbert Schuch Germany 34 4.1k 1.7k 1.6k 510 221 96 4.4k
Jutho Haegeman Belgium 33 3.2k 0.8× 666 0.4× 1.5k 0.9× 583 1.1× 179 0.8× 72 3.6k
V. Murg Austria 16 3.2k 0.8× 801 0.5× 1.2k 0.7× 451 0.9× 86 0.4× 20 3.5k
Ian P. McCulloch Australia 38 4.5k 1.1× 551 0.3× 2.7k 1.6× 818 1.6× 128 0.6× 116 5.1k
Mari Carmen Bañuls Germany 30 2.7k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 895 0.5× 642 1.3× 61 0.3× 83 3.2k
Marcello Dalmonte Italy 36 5.1k 1.2× 2.0k 1.2× 1.2k 0.7× 906 1.8× 104 0.5× 99 5.5k
Sarang Gopalakrishnan United States 42 5.1k 1.3× 1.3k 0.8× 1.8k 1.1× 1.8k 3.5× 146 0.7× 145 5.5k
Bela Bauer United States 24 2.3k 0.6× 723 0.4× 1.1k 0.6× 499 1.0× 61 0.3× 46 2.7k
Maksym Serbyn United States 30 5.5k 1.3× 1.1k 0.6× 2.0k 1.2× 2.0k 4.0× 224 1.0× 66 5.9k
Marko Žnidarič Slovenia 32 3.8k 0.9× 1.0k 0.6× 1.2k 0.8× 1.8k 3.5× 121 0.5× 81 4.1k
Luca Tagliacozzo Spain 24 2.6k 0.6× 1.0k 0.6× 935 0.6× 551 1.1× 67 0.3× 52 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Norbert Schuch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Schuch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Schuch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Schuch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert Schuch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Schuch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Schuch. The network helps show where Norbert Schuch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norbert Schuch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norbert Schuch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norbert Schuch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Norbert Schuch. Norbert Schuch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schuch, Norbert, et al.. (2025). Fractional domain wall statistics in spin chains with anomalous symmetries. SciPost Physics. 18(2). 2 indexed citations
2.
Schuch, Norbert, et al.. (2025). Stable and efficient differentiation of tensor network algorithms. Physical Review Research. 7(1). 3 indexed citations
3.
Schuch, Norbert, et al.. (2025). Gauging quantum phases: A matrix product state approach. Physical review. B.. 112(11).
4.
Hangleiter, Dominik, et al.. (2025). Sign Problem in Tensor-Network Contraction. PRX Quantum. 6(1). 4 indexed citations
5.
Ljubotina, Marko, et al.. (2024). Tangent Space Generators of Matrix Product States and Exact Floquet Quantum Scars. PRX Quantum. 5(4). 3 indexed citations
6.
Dreyer, Henrik, Laurens Vanderstraeten, Ji-Yao Chen, Ruben Verresen, & Norbert Schuch. (2024). Robustness of critical U(1) spin liquids and emergent symmetries in tensor networks. Physical review. B.. 109(19). 1 indexed citations
8.
Vanhecke, Bram, et al.. (2023). Detecting Emergent Continuous Symmetries at Quantum Criticality. Physical Review Letters. 131(3). 36505–36505. 4 indexed citations
9.
Schuch, Norbert, et al.. (2022). Tensor Networks Can Resolve Fermi Surfaces. Physical Review Letters. 129(20). 206401–206401. 16 indexed citations
10.
Cirac, J. I., David Pérez-Garcı́a, Norbert Schuch, & Frank Verstraete. (2021). Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems. Reviews of Modern Physics. 93(4). 447 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Chen, Ji-Yao, Sylvain Capponi, Alexander Wietek, et al.. (2020). SU(3)1 Chiral Spin Liquid on the Square Lattice: A View from Symmetric Projected Entangled Pair States. Physical Review Letters. 125(1). 17201–17201. 29 indexed citations
12.
Ge, Yimin, et al.. (2020). Projected Entangled Pair States: Fundamental Analytical and Numerical Limitations. Physical Review Letters. 125(21). 210504–210504. 14 indexed citations
13.
Ge, Yimin, et al.. (2018). A generalization of the injectivity condition for projected entangled pair states. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 59(2). 24 indexed citations
14.
Scarpa, Giuseppe, Yimin Ge, Juan José García‐Ripoll, et al.. (2018). Computational complexity of PEPS zero testing. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
15.
Yang, Shuo, Thorsten B. Wahl, Hong-Hao Tu, Norbert Schuch, & J. I. Cirac. (2015). Chiral Projected Entangled-Pair State with Topological Order. Physical Review Letters. 114(10). 106803–106803. 45 indexed citations
16.
Poilblanc, Didier, et al.. (2014). Edge Theories in Projected Entangled Pair State Models. Physical Review Letters. 112(3). 36402–36402. 35 indexed citations
17.
Haegeman, Jutho, Spyridon Michalakis, Bruno Nachtergaele, et al.. (2013). Elementary Excitations in Gapped Quantum Spin Systems. Physical Review Letters. 111(8). 80401–80401. 61 indexed citations
18.
Haegeman, Jutho, David Pérez-Garcı́a, J. I. Cirac, & Norbert Schuch. (2012). Order Parameter for Symmetry-Protected Phases in One Dimension. Physical Review Letters. 109(5). 50402–50402. 68 indexed citations
19.
Schuch, Norbert, et al.. (2012). Gapless Hamiltonians for the Toric Code Using the Projected Entangled Pair State Formalism. Physical Review Letters. 109(26). 260401–260401. 14 indexed citations
20.
Schuch, Norbert, Michael M. Wolf, Frank Verstraete, & J. I. Cirac. (2008). Simulation of Quantum Many-Body Systems with Strings of Operators and Monte Carlo Tensor Contractions. Physical Review Letters. 100(4). 40501–40501. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026