Sandeep K. Goyal
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- G. ScolesDavid L. SchuttThomas KonradAndrew ForbesFilippus S. RouxMelanie McLarenAngela DudleyMiles J. Padgett
- Topics
- Quantum Information and Cryptography (25 papers)Quantum Mechanics and Applications (13 papers)Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaCanadaSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Sandeep K. Goyal
42 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
- Artificial Intelligence 509
- Spectroscopy 111
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 101
- Biomedical Engineering 80
Countries citing papers authored by Sandeep K. Goyal
This map shows the geographic impact of Sandeep K. Goyal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandeep K. Goyal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandeep K. Goyal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sandeep K. Goyal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandeep K. Goyal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandeep K. Goyal. The network helps show where Sandeep K. Goyal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandeep K. Goyal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandeep K. Goyal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandeep K. Goyal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandeep K. Goyal. Sandeep K. Goyal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 78 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Sandeep K. Goyal
Sandeep K. Goyal is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (25 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (13 papers) and Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (21 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (509 citations). Sandeep K. Goyal has collaborated with scholars based in India, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include G. Scoles, David L. Schutt, Thomas Konrad, Andrew Forbes, Filippus S. Roux, Melanie McLaren, Angela Dudley, Miles J. Padgett, Mhlambululi Mafu and Daniel Giovannini. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and The Journal of Chemical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.