Jean‐Baptiste Denis
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety 6
- Parasitology top 10%
- Food Science top 10%
- Food Safety and Hygiene 5
- Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology 3
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
-
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 6
-
- Body Composition Measurement Techniques 4
-
- Nutritional Studies and Diet 3
-
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses 3
-
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 3
- Co-authors
- Marco ScutariRégis PouillotFred A. van EeuwijkHans‐Peter PiephoPascal BeaudeauJ. C. GowerIsabelle AlbertAnne Thébault
- Journals
- Journal of Nutrition (1 paper)Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)British Journal Of Nutrition (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceMoroccoNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jean‐Baptiste Denis
29 papers receiving 772 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Biotechnology 114
- Parasitology 48
- Food Science 125
- Statistics and Probability 55
- Agronomy and Crop Science 60
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Baptiste Denis
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Baptiste Denis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Baptiste Denis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Baptiste Denis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Baptiste Denis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Baptiste Denis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Baptiste Denis. The network helps show where Jean‐Baptiste Denis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jean‐Baptiste Denis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 25 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 31 | |
| 4 | Elicitation for food microbial risk assessment: a probabilistic approach extending Risk Ranger proposal | 2013 | 3 |
| 5 | 2013 | 71 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 64 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2005 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 106 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 58 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 1 |
About Jean‐Baptiste Denis
Jean‐Baptiste Denis is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Analytical Chemistry and Parasitology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 811 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (6 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (6 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (5 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (4 papers), Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology (3 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (3 papers) and Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (114 citations), Parasitology (48 citations) and Food Science (125 citations). Jean‐Baptiste Denis has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Marco Scutari, Régis Pouillot, Fred A. van Eeuwijk, Hans‐Peter Piepho, Pascal Beaudeau, J. C. Gower, Isabelle Albert, Anne Thébault, Françoise S. Le Guyader and Peter Teunis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Nutrition, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and British Journal Of Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.