Jean Gray

793 citations
29 papers · 527 indexed · h-index 11

Jean Gray

24 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers

Jean Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Family Practice 108
  • Medical Terminology 7
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 102
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 12
  • Toxicology 27
Replace Réjean Laprise with:
Réjean Laprise Canada
Amy M. Knight United States
Stephen Schenkel United States
Basia Diug Australia
Heather L. Heiman United States
Casey Tak United States
Stacy Cooper Bailey United States
Elise Russo United States
Sandra Benavides United States
Luke Sato United States
Jean Gray relative to Réjean Laprise Canada Réjean Laprise's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Réjean Laprise · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jean Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jean Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jean Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean Gray. The network helps show where Jean Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jean Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jean Gray Line = papers co-authored together Jean Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201510
2 20132
3 20081
4
Changing physician prescribing behaviour.
200617
5 20061
6 20060
7 20051
8 200510
9
SARS and the Academic Health Sector.
20051
10
Academic health leadership: looking to the future. Proceedings of a workshop held at the Canadian Institute of Academic Medicine meeting Québec, Que., Canada, Apr. 25 and 26, 2003.
200334
11 200316
12 200260
13
What patients want to know about their medications
200248
14 19991
15 199878
16 19977
17 19941
18
Treatment of pneumonia in the elderly: pharmacological considerations.
19903
19 198917
20
Gilead. Tradition and history
19696

About Jean Gray

Jean Gray is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology and General Health Professions, having authored 29 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (3 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (108 citations), Medical Terminology (7 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (102 citations). Jean Gray has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Karen Mann, Kalpana Nair, Alan Cassels, Mitchell Levine, Sheri Burns, Jeffrey Turnbull, James McCormack, Lisa Dolovich, Paul Armstrong and Joan Sargeant. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, Health Expectations, Drug Information Journal and The American Journal of Geriatric Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026