Luke Sato

1.1k citations
30 papers · 534 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Luke Sato

30 papers receiving 502 citations

Peers

Luke Sato
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Pharmacy 171
  • Health Information Management 152
  • Family Practice 57
  • Emergency Medical Services 157
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 20
Replace Alan Wolff with:
Alan Wolff Australia
Pierre Lewalle United States
Derek W Meeks United States
Elise Russo United States
Anita Deakin Australia
Erin Graydon-Baker United States
Yvonne Pfeiffer Switzerland
Louise Schneider United States
Jason S. Adelman United States
Stuart Whittaker Australia
Luke Sato relative to Alan Wolff Australia Alan Wolff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.9×
Alan Wolff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Sato

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Sato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Sato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Sato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Sato

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Sato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Sato. The network helps show where Luke Sato may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Sato, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Sato Line = papers co-authored together Luke Sato links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20241
3 202116
4 202027
5 20191
6 201883
7 20174
8 201612
9 201538
10 201516
11 201447
12 20141
13 2010110
14 200828
15 200519
16 200521
17 200429
18
Linking Health Education and Health Care Service Information via the WWW: The HealthAware Project
19981
19
The PartnerWeb Project: a component-based approach to enterprise-wide information integration and dissemination.
19974
20 199414

About Luke Sato

Luke Sato is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Health Information Management, Emergency Medical Services, Family Practice and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (15 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (14 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (4 papers), Radiology practices and education (4 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (171 citations), Health Information Management (152 citations), Family Practice (57 citations), Emergency Medical Services (157 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (20 citations). Luke Sato has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Israel. Frequent co-authors include David W. Bates, Allan Frankel, Erin Graydon-Baker, Osnat Levtzion‐Korach, Carol Keohane, John Orav, Frank G. Opelka, Thomas H. Glick, William R. Berry and Atul A. Gawande. Their work appears in journals such as The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, American Journal of Medical Quality, Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, BMJ Open and American Journal of Roentgenology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026