Janice Fine

33 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Janice Fine
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Public Administration 419
  • General Health Professions 310
  • Political Science and International Relations 202
  • Strategy and Management 114
  • Sociology and Political Science 302
Replace Maite Tapia with:
Maite Tapia United States
Stephanie Tailby United Kingdom
Rebecca Gumbrell‐McCormick United Kingdom
Bruce Nissen United States
Jens Lind Denmark
Lucas Ronconi Argentina
Peter Ellguth Germany
Bjarke Refslund Denmark
Christian Lyhne Ibsen Denmark
Trine Pernille Larsen Denmark
Janice Fine relative to Maite Tapia United States Maite Tapia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Maite Tapia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Fine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Fine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Fine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Fine. The network helps show where Janice Fine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Janice Fine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janice Fine Line = papers co-authored together Janice Fine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005123
2 201078
3 200761
4 201743
5 201835
6 201235
7 201628
8 200926
9 201023
10 200022
11 201520
12 200820
13 201315
14 200012
15 201712
16 202311
17 20117
18 20177
19 20146
20 20166

About Janice Fine

Janice Fine is a scholar working on Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Strategy and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 37 papers that have together received 633 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (26 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (13 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (9 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (8 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (7 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (3 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (2 papers) and International Labor and Employment Law (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (419 citations), General Health Professions (310 citations), Political Science and International Relations (202 citations), Strategy and Management (114 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (302 citations). Janice Fine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Bolivia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel J. Tichenor, Tim Bartley, Matthew Amengual, Victor Narro, Brian Burgoon, Wade Jacoby, Natasha Iskander, Ruth Milkman, Roger Waldinger and Michael J. Piore. Their work appears in journals such as Politics & Society, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Relations industrielles, Journal of Industrial Relations and International Labour Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact