Janice Brown
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jane N. HannahMark L. WolraichAnna BaumgaertelHarvey S. SingerLynn RosenbergJohn T. WalkupEmily HarrisJennifer Mohr
- Topics
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers)Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers)
- Journals
- PEDIATRICSJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent PsychiatryJournal of Clinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Janice Brown
10 papers receiving 796 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Psychiatry and Mental health 552
- Clinical Psychology 500
- Cognitive Neuroscience 383
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 169
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 88
Countries citing papers authored by Janice Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Brown. The network helps show where Janice Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice Brown. Janice Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 454 | |
| 5 | 122 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 102 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | Improving medical student interviewing skills. | 12 |
About Janice Brown
Janice Brown is a scholar working on Family Practice, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (6 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (5 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (552 citations), Clinical Psychology (500 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (383 citations). Janice Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jane N. Hannah, Mark L. Wolraich, Anna Baumgaertel, Harvey S. Singer, Lynn Rosenberg, John T. Walkup, Emily Harris, Jennifer Mohr, Gary A. Chase and Richard P. Allen. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.