This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Quint's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Quint with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Quint more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Quint. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Quint. The network helps show where Janet Quint may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Quint
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Quint.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Quint based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Quint. Janet Quint is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Quint, Janet, et al.. (2018). Project-Based Learning: A Promising Approach to Improving Student Outcomes. Issue Focus.. MDRC.1 indexed citations
2.
Grossman, Jean Baldwin, et al.. (2015). Changing Community Colleges: Early Lessons from Completion by Design.. MDRC.5 indexed citations
3.
Quint, Janet, et al.. (2015). Scaling Up the Success for All Model of School Reform: Final Report from the Investing in Innovation (i3) Evaluation. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
Quint, Janet, et al.. (2013). The Success for All Model of School Reform: Early Findings from the Investing in Innovation (i3) Scale-Up.. MDRC.5 indexed citations
7.
Quint, Janet. (2011). Professional Development for Teachers: What Two Rigorous Studies Tell Us.. MDRC.7 indexed citations
8.
Quint, Janet, et al.. (2011). Scaling Up Is Hard to Do Progress and Challenges During the First Year of the Achieving the Dream Developmental Education Initiative.6 indexed citations
9.
Quint, Janet, et al.. (2008). Relationships, Rigor and Readiness. Strategies for Improving High Schools.. Issue Lab (Candid).7 indexed citations
10.
Quint, Janet, et al.. (2008). Using Student Data to Improve Teaching and Learning: Findings from an Evaluation of the Formative Assessments of Students Thinking in Reading (FAST-R) Program in Boston Elementary Schools.. MDRC.20 indexed citations
11.
Quint, Janet. (2008). Lessons from Leading Models.. Educational leadership. 65(8). 64–68.3 indexed citations
12.
Quint, Janet, et al.. (2007). Instructional Leadership, Teaching Quality and Student Achievement Suggestive Evidence from Three Urban School Districts.. MDRC.26 indexed citations
13.
Quint, Janet. (2006). Meeting Five Critical Challenges of High School Reform. Lessons from Research on Three Reform Models.. MDRC. 2006.39 indexed citations
14.
Herlihy, Corinne & Janet Quint. (2006). Emerging Evidence on Improving High School Student Achievement and Graduation Rates: The Effects of Four Popular Improvement Programs. Issue Brief..11 indexed citations
15.
Quint, Janet, et al.. (2005). The Challenge of Scaling Up Educational Reform. Findings and Lessons from First Things First. Final Report.. MDRC.17 indexed citations
Cave, George & Janet Quint. (1990). Career Beginnings Impact Evaluation: Findings from a Program for Disadvantaged High School Students..22 indexed citations
20.
Quint, Janet & James Riccio. (1985). The Challenge of Serving Pregnant and Parenting Teens. Lessons from Project Redirection..5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.