Janet Olds

1.3k citations
35 papers · 952 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Janet Olds

32 papers receiving 886 citations

Peers

Janet Olds
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 708
  • Sensory Systems 135
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 232
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 61
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 296
Replace Signy Sheldon with:
Signy Sheldon Canada
Noa Ofen United States
Farshad A. Mansouri Australia
Ulrike Basten Germany
Patrizia Thoma Germany
Daniela J. Palombo Canada
Sarah E. Donohue United States
Wouter B. Groen Netherlands
Thanujeni Pathman United States
Robert Rothermel United States
Janet Olds relative to Signy Sheldon Canada Signy Sheldon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Signy Sheldon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet Olds

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Olds's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Olds with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Olds more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Olds

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Olds. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Olds. The network helps show where Janet Olds may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet Olds, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet Olds Line = papers co-authored together Janet Olds links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1978229
2 198298
3 197294
4
Learning and the hippocampus.
197285
5 201253
6 200653
7 200751
8 201438
9 201235
10 200933
11 201018
12 201117
13 200717
14 201415
15 200413
16 201213
17 202112
18 202311
19
Parents' Perspectives on Their Roles in Facilitating the Inclusion of Their Children with Hearing Impairment.
200210
20 201810

About Janet Olds

Janet Olds is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing, having authored 35 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (10 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (9 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (5 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (5 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (708 citations), Sensory Systems (135 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (232 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (61 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (296 citations). Janet Olds has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Gordon Winocur, Elizabeth M. Fitzpatrick, Morris Moscovitch, M. Segal, Andrée Durieux-Smith, JoAnne Whittingham, Alice Eriks‐Brophy, David Schramm, Cheryll Duquette and Isabelle Gaboury. Their work appears in journals such as Cochlear Implants International, International Journal of Audiology, The Volta Review, Epilepsia and Journal of Medical Screening.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact