Journal of Medical Screening

1.2k papers and 25.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Medical Screening in the last decades have received a total of 25.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Medical Screening usually cover Oncology (653 papers), Epidemiology (244 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (233 papers) specifically the topics of Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (489 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (417 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (178 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Medical Screening are Nicholas Wald, Euǵenio Paci, Jane Wardle, Stephen W. Duffy, Sue Moss, Jo Waller, Joan K. Morris, Elsebeth Lynge, Glenn E. Palomaki and Allan Hackshaw.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Medical Screening

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Medical Screening. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Medical Screening.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Medical Screening

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Medical Screening. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Medical Screening with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Medical Screening more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025