Jane Smith
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 5
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Health Policy Implementation Science 7
- Mobile Health and mHealth Applications 6
- Community Health and Development 5
- Family Practice top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 6
- Physiology top 10%
- Asthma and respiratory diseases 10
-
- Diabetes Management and Education 5
-
- Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare 4
- Co-authors
- Charles AbrahamMarco BardusSamantha van BeurdenMichael NobleB.D.W. HarrisonColin GreavesMiranda MugfordRichard Holland
- Journals
- Thorax (3 papers)Journal of Asthma (3 papers)British Journal of General Practice (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jane Smith
47 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Applied Psychology 192
- General Health Professions 540
- Family Practice 27
- Psychiatry and Mental health 182
- Physiology 278
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Smith. The network helps show where Jane Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 65 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 59 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 34 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 124 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 197 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 37 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 37 |
About Jane Smith
Jane Smith is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing and Pharmacy, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (10 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (6 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Community Health and Development (5 papers) and Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (192 citations), General Health Professions (540 citations), Family Practice (27 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (182 citations) and Physiology (278 citations). Jane Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Charles Abraham, Marco Bardus, Samantha van Beurden, Michael Noble, B.D.W. Harrison, Colin Greaves, Miranda Mugford, Richard Holland, Mark Tarrant and Aleksandra Borek. Their work appears in journals such as Thorax, Journal of Asthma, British Journal of General Practice, European Journal of Public Health and Journal of Interlibrary Loan Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.