Emma Cockcroft

939 total citations
44 papers, 482 citations indexed

About

Emma Cockcroft is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Cockcroft has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 482 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. Recurrent topics in Emma Cockcroft's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (9 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (7 papers). Emma Cockcroft is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (9 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers) and Diabetes Management and Research (7 papers). Emma Cockcroft collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and United States. Emma Cockcroft's co-authors include Alan R. Barker, Craig A. Williams, Sarah R. Jackman, Neil Armstrong, Bert Bond, Kristin Liabo, Robert Andrews, Parth Narendran, Sam Harris and Phillip E. Gates and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Emma Cockcroft

37 papers receiving 475 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Cockcroft United Kingdom 13 164 99 96 85 82 44 482
Ada Alqunaibet Saudi Arabia 10 59 0.4× 91 0.9× 49 0.5× 67 0.8× 71 0.9× 24 438
Reema Kadri United States 15 300 1.8× 85 0.9× 63 0.7× 203 2.4× 36 0.4× 33 729
Thamindu Wedatilake United Kingdom 5 167 1.0× 247 2.5× 49 0.5× 336 4.0× 39 0.5× 14 598
Elizabeth Bechard United States 8 202 1.2× 65 0.7× 29 0.3× 59 0.7× 76 0.9× 13 551
Annette Haywood United Kingdom 12 164 1.0× 158 1.6× 16 0.2× 61 0.7× 65 0.8× 21 493
Ann O’Hanlon Ireland 9 115 0.7× 53 0.5× 33 0.3× 31 0.4× 36 0.4× 14 470
Laura Hill United States 10 258 1.6× 66 0.7× 28 0.3× 27 0.3× 93 1.1× 17 474
Ann Kirkness Australia 13 112 0.7× 66 0.7× 32 0.3× 93 1.1× 42 0.5× 27 481
Chia‐Hui Wang Taiwan 11 58 0.4× 35 0.4× 61 0.6× 52 0.6× 28 0.3× 31 428
Mustafa Tözün Türkiye 9 129 0.8× 347 3.5× 33 0.3× 21 0.2× 75 0.9× 45 643

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Cockcroft

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Cockcroft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Cockcroft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Cockcroft more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Cockcroft

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Cockcroft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Cockcroft. The network helps show where Emma Cockcroft may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Cockcroft

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Cockcroft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Cockcroft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Cockcroft. Emma Cockcroft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pemberton, John, Richard Pulsford, Brad Metcalf, et al.. (2025). Glucose‐lowering effects of physical activity in type 1 diabetes: A causal modelling and matched‐pair analysis approach. Diabetic Medicine. 42(12). e70146–e70146.
3.
Cockcroft, Emma, et al.. (2025). Quality of life and physical activity in type 1 diabetes. BMC Pediatrics. 25(1). 345–345.
4.
Winder, Rachel, John Campbell, Jeffrey Lambert, et al.. (2024). Exploring How Patients Are Supported to Use Online Services in Primary Care in England Through “Digital Facilitation”: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 26. e56528–e56528. 2 indexed citations
5.
Cockcroft, Emma, Renuka Dias, Jenny Lloyd, et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of Educational and Psychoeducational Self‐Management Interventions in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Pediatric Diabetes. 2024(1). 2921845–2921845. 2 indexed citations
6.
Warmoth, Krystal, et al.. (2023). Determinants of implementing deprescribing for older adults in English care homes: a qualitative interview study. BMJ Open. 13(11). e081305–e081305. 2 indexed citations
7.
Goodwin, Victoria A, Terence J. Quinn, Emma Cockcroft, et al.. (2023). Including older people in health and social care research: best practice recommendations based on the INCLUDE framework. Age and Ageing. 52(6). 43 indexed citations
8.
Carr, Matthew, Darren M. Ashcroft, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, et al.. (2023). Temporal trends in eating disorder and self-harm incidence rates among adolescents and young adults in the UK in the 2 years since onset of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 7(8). 544–554. 45 indexed citations
9.
Sugg, Holly Victoria Rose, David Richards, Anne‐Marie Russell, et al.. (2022). Nurses’ strategies for overcoming barriers to fundamental nursing care in patients with COVID ‐19 caused by infection with the SARS‐COV ‐2 virus: Results from the ‘ COVID‐NURSE ’ survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 79(3). 1003–1017. 7 indexed citations
11.
Liabo, Kristin, et al.. (2022). Epistemic justice in public involvement and engagement: Creating conditions for impact. Health Expectations. 25(4). 1967–1978. 14 indexed citations
12.
Rodgers, Lauren R., Peter Rouse, Oli Williams, et al.. (2021). Moving through Motherhood: Involving the Public in Research to Inform Physical Activity Promotion throughout Pregnancy and Beyond. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(9). 4482–4482. 5 indexed citations
15.
Sugg, Holly Victoria Rose, Anne‐Marie Russell, Leila Morgan, et al.. (2021). Fundamental nursing care in patients with the SARS-CoV-2 virus: results from the ‘COVID-NURSE’ mixed methods survey into nurses’ experiences of missed care and barriers to care. BMC Nursing. 20(1). 215–215. 34 indexed citations
17.
Cockcroft, Emma, Nicky Britten, Linda Long, & Kristin Liabo. (2019). How is knowledge shared in Public involvement? A qualitative study of involvement in a health technology assessment. Health Expectations. 23(2). 348–357. 10 indexed citations
18.
Staley, Kristina, et al.. (2019). ‘What can I do that will most help researchers?’ A different approach to training the public at the start of their involvement in research. Research Involvement and Engagement. 5(1). 10–10. 20 indexed citations
19.
Bond, Bert, et al.. (2019). Validity of the Supramaximal Test to Verify Maximal Oxygen Uptake in Children and Adolescents. Pediatric Exercise Science. 31(2). 213–222. 26 indexed citations
20.
Jackman, Sarah R., Matthew S. Brook, Richard Pulsford, et al.. (2018). Tart cherry concentrate does not enhance muscle protein synthesis response to exercise and protein in healthy older men. Experimental Gerontology. 110. 202–208. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026