E.M. Sluijs

2.0k citations
20 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

E.M. Sluijs

19 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

E.M. Sluijs
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Family Practice 305
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 116
  • Applied Psychology 116
  • Health Information Management 95
  • Rehabilitation 139
Replace John Feightner with:
John Feightner Canada
Elizabeth A. Schlenk United States
Debra K. Litzelman United States
Jenny Hainsworth United Kingdom
Felicity Astin United Kingdom
Richard G. Thomson United Kingdom
Heng‐Hsin Tung Taiwan
Alison Hayes Australia
J.P.M. Diederiks Netherlands
Gerard Gormley United Kingdom
E.M. Sluijs relative to John Feightner Canada John Feightner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
John Feightner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.M. Sluijs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.M. Sluijs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.M. Sluijs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.M. Sluijs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.M. Sluijs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.M. Sluijs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.M. Sluijs. The network helps show where E.M. Sluijs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside E.M. Sluijs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.M. Sluijs Line = papers co-authored together E.M. Sluijs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200857
2 200862
3 2007438
4 200765
5 200659
6
Patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta review
200637
7 200327
8 200115
9 19996
10 199915
11 199941
12 199714
13 1993415
14 199326
15 19931
16 199115
17 199120
18 1991106
19
Bibliography: patient compliance, a survey of reviews.
19891
20 198565

About E.M. Sluijs

E.M. Sluijs is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health Information Management, Occupational Therapy, Pharmacy and Applied Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (5 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (5 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (305 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (116 citations), Applied Psychology (116 citations), Health Information Management (95 citations) and Rehabilitation (139 citations). E.M. Sluijs has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Qatar and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Jouke van der Zee, Jozien M. Bensing, Liset van Dijk, Sandra van Dulmen, Eibert R. Heerdink, Denise de Ridder, J.J. Knibbe, R.D. Friele, J. Legemaate and Denise T. D. de Ridder. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Physical Therapy, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Patient Education and Counseling and Health Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026