Jane Sims

585 citations
21 papers · 431 indexed · h-index 11

Jane Sims

21 papers receiving 399 citations

Peers

Jane Sims
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Chemical Health and Safety 6
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 28
  • General Health Professions 187
  • Emergency Medical Services 47
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Replace Sandra Adams Motzer with:
Sandra Adams Motzer United States
Rita D’Aoust United States
Emilene Reisdorfer Canada
Philip L. Reed United States
Tuomas Koskela Finland
Melissa Hladek United States
Yongyuth Ruanta Canada
Gunnar Tellnes Norway
Katharine A. Allen United States
Haocen Wang United States
Jane Sims relative to Sandra Adams Motzer United States Sandra Adams Motzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Sandra Adams Motzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Sims

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Sims's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Sims with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Sims more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Sims

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Sims. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Sims. The network helps show where Jane Sims may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Sims, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Sims Line = papers co-authored together Jane Sims links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20134
2 201215
3 201269
4 201150
5
Are general practice networks 'ready' for clinical data management?
20092
6 20075
7
Ageing without driving: keeping older people connected
200712
8 2005100
9
Patient social and economic circumstances--GP perceptions and their influence on management.
20054
10 20022
11
Mapping the role of general practice in strengthening the Australian primary health care sector.
20011
12
The evaluation of stress management strategies in general practice: an evidence-led approach.
199723
13 19954
14 199240
15 199020
16 198815
17 198810
18 19873
19 19878
20 198541

About Jane Sims

Jane Sims is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (6 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (28 citations) and General Health Professions (187 citations). Jane Sims has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Carroll, Ruth McNair, Nick Stone, Terry Haines, Prue Morgan, Brian Jolly, Romi Haas, Stephen Maloney, Elizabeth Molloy and J. Rick Turner. Their work appears in journals such as Psychophysiology, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Physiology & Behavior, American Journal of Industrial Medicine and International Journal of Nursing Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026