Philip L. Reed

891 total citations
16 papers, 531 citations indexed

About

Philip L. Reed is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip L. Reed has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 531 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip L. Reed's work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers). Philip L. Reed is often cited by papers focused on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (3 papers) and Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers). Philip L. Reed collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Philip L. Reed's co-authors include James C. Anthony, Naomi Breslau, Barbara D. Ames, Lisa Gorman, Adrian J. Blow, Douglas N. Jackson, Adejoke B. Ayoola, Mary D. Nettleman, Hwan Chung and Harvey A. Skinner and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, American Journal of Epidemiology and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Philip L. Reed

16 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Philip L. Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Clinical Psychology 261
  • General Health Professions 113
  • Social Psychology 82
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 73
  • Epidemiology 56
Replace Karena Leppert with:
Karena Leppert Germany
Markku Ojanen Finland
M. Amir Israel
Ana Flávia Barros da Silva Lima Brazil
Wenche Schrøder Bjorbækmo Norway
Cristina Maria Bostan Romania
LyInn Chung Taiwan
Marta Nieto‐Moreno Spain
Myung Hee Ahn South Korea
Eliane Corrêa Chaves Brazil
Karena Leppert Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Philip L. Reed
Philip L. Reed · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Philip L. Reed
Philip L. Reed · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Philip L. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip L. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip L. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip L. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip L. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip L. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip L. Reed. The network helps show where Philip L. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip L. Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip L. Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip L. Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip L. Reed. Philip L. Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 18
2 20
3 5
4 10
5 52
6 28
7 139
8 59
9 4
10 108
11 26
12 13
13 10
14 23
15 13
16
Assessing Inferential Accuracy In Clinical Judgment And Person Perception
3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026