Jane Russo
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- General Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Psychology and Mental Health 18
- Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research 4
-
- Gender, Sexuality, and Education 20
- Co-authors
- Sérgio Carrara (4 shared papers)Fabíola Rohden (9 shared papers)Alain Giami (3 shared papers)Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano (1 shared paper)Keyla Cristiane do Nascimento (1 shared paper)Maria Luíza Heilborn (1 shared paper)Rafaela Zorzanelli (1 shared paper)Kenneth Rochel de Camargo (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Jane Russo
40 papers receiving 339 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Gender Studies 147
- General Psychology 13
- General Health Professions 149
- Reproductive Medicine 49
- History 56
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Russo
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Russo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Russo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Russo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Russo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Russo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Russo. The network helps show where Jane Russo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jane Russo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 70 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 7 | Do desvio ao transtorno: a medicalização da sexualidade na nosografia psiquiátrica contemporânea | 2004 | 12 |
| 8 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 20 | Gender differences in the field of sexology : new contexts and old definitions | 2011 | 6 |
About Jane Russo
Jane Russo is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, General Health Professions, History and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 44 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Sexuality, and Education (20 papers), Psychology and Mental Health (18 papers), Male Reproductive Health Studies (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (4 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (4 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers) and History of Medicine and Tropical Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (147 citations), General Psychology (13 citations), General Health Professions (149 citations), Reproductive Medicine (49 citations) and History (56 citations). Jane Russo has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Sérgio Carrara, Fabíola Rohden, Alain Giami, Edna Lúcia Tinoco Ponciano, Keyla Cristiane do Nascimento, Maria Luíza Heilborn, Rafaela Zorzanelli and Kenneth Rochel de Camargo. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Sexual Health, Physis Revista de Saúde Coletiva, Psychoanalysis and History, Cadernos de Saúde Pública and Revista de Saúde Pública.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.