Revista de Saúde Pública

5.1k papers and 104.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.1k papers published in Revista de Saúde Pública in the last decades have received a total of 104.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Revista de Saúde Pública usually cover General Health Professions (1.8k papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k papers) and Epidemiology (651 papers) specifically the topics of Health, Nursing, Elderly Care (580 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (544 papers) and Global Maternal and Child Health (365 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revista de Saúde Pública are Oswaldo Paulo Forattini, Carlos Augusto Monteiro, Renato Peixoto Veras, Luiz Roberto Ramos, Aluísio J. D. Barros, Cesar G. Víctora, Rosely Sichieri, Marco Aurélio Peres, Renata Bertazzi Levy and Maria Helena D’Aquino Benício.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revista de Saúde Pública

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revista de Saúde Pública. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revista de Saúde Pública.

Countries where authors publish in Revista de Saúde Pública

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revista de Saúde Pública. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revista de Saúde Pública with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revista de Saúde Pública more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025