Jane Nash

1.0k citations
17 papers · 744 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Nash

17 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers

Jane Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • General Decision Sciences 122
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 162
  • Safety Research 98
  • Marketing 83
  • Applied Psychology 43
Replace Katherine A. Burson with:
Katherine A. Burson United States
Kimberlee Weaver United States
Mário B. Ferreira Portugal
Gail Tom United States
David D. Loschelder Germany
Kenneth S Bordens United States
Leo Yeykelis United States
Irene Scopelliti United Kingdom
Robert‐Vincent Joule France
Alain Quiamzade Switzerland
Jane Nash relative to Katherine A. Burson United States Katherine A. Burson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Katherine A. Burson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Nash. The network helps show where Jane Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jane Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Nash Line = papers co-authored together Jane Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1994280
2
On the nature of planning in writing.
1996118
3
Doing Data Analysis with SPSS: Version 18.0
2008110
4 199164
5 199324
6 201924
7 198820
8 199320
9 200015
10 201415
11 200913
12
Doing Data Analysis with SPSS: Version 14.0 (with CD-ROM) (Doing Data Analysis with SPSS)
200511
13 201611
14 200310
15 20066
16
Discovering Information Systems: an exploratory approach
20102
17 20211

About Jane Nash

Jane Nash is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 17 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (3 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (2 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper), Natural Language Processing Techniques (1 paper), Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper) and Computational Drug Discovery Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (122 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (162 citations), Safety Research (98 citations), Marketing (83 citations) and Applied Psychology (43 citations). Jane Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert H. F. Carver, John R. Hayes, Cynthia A. Joyner, Hal R. Arkes, Mark V. Pezzo, Eric R. Stone, Gary M. Schumacher, Bruce W. Carlson, Mike Armour and Stefania Penkala. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Journal of Economic Psychology, Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain and Psychology in the Schools.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact