Eric R. Stone

3.2k total citations
49 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

Eric R. Stone is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Eric R. Stone has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in General Decision Sciences, 15 papers in Applied Psychology and 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Eric R. Stone's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (25 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers). Eric R. Stone is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (25 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers). Eric R. Stone collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Eric R. Stone's co-authors include J. Frank Yates, Andrew M. Parker, Paul C. Price, Mark V. Pezzo, Laura Wray‐Lake, Cynthia A. Joyner, Hal R. Arkes, Jane Nash, Wändi Bruine de Bruin and James A. Schirillo and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Animal Behaviour and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Eric R. Stone

47 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eric R. Stone United States 25 739 565 488 346 304 49 2.3k
Ann-Renée Blais Canada 13 540 0.7× 520 0.9× 364 0.7× 355 1.0× 251 0.8× 36 2.1k
Anton Kühberger Austria 20 1.1k 1.5× 598 1.1× 514 1.1× 504 1.5× 522 1.7× 62 2.8k
Stephan Dickert United Kingdom 18 505 0.7× 692 1.2× 319 0.7× 288 0.8× 380 1.3× 52 2.0k
Peter Ayton United Kingdom 24 788 1.1× 484 0.9× 236 0.5× 457 1.3× 277 0.9× 89 2.2k
Nigel Harvey United Kingdom 29 819 1.1× 467 0.8× 193 0.4× 420 1.2× 324 1.1× 94 2.5k
Karl Halvor Teigen Norway 29 1.2k 1.7× 857 1.5× 377 0.8× 298 0.9× 438 1.4× 124 3.1k
Craig R. M. McKenzie United States 22 940 1.3× 370 0.7× 254 0.5× 420 1.2× 378 1.2× 47 2.1k
Joshua Klayman United States 16 1.2k 1.6× 755 1.3× 309 0.6× 375 1.1× 577 1.9× 23 3.4k
Nancy Brekke United States 10 591 0.8× 904 1.6× 330 0.7× 282 0.8× 456 1.5× 11 2.2k
Maya Bar‐Hillel Israel 28 1.4k 1.9× 513 0.9× 308 0.6× 707 2.0× 467 1.5× 65 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Eric R. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric R. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric R. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric R. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric R. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric R. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric R. Stone. The network helps show where Eric R. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric R. Stone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric R. Stone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric R. Stone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eric R. Stone. Eric R. Stone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stone, Eric R., et al.. (2023). Automated calibration training for forecasters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 36(4). 1 indexed citations
2.
Stone, Eric R., et al.. (2023). Thinking without knowing: Psychological and behavioral consequences of unjustified confidence regarding blackjack strategy. Frontiers in Psychology. 14. 1015676–1015676. 3 indexed citations
4.
Stone, Eric R., et al.. (2018). Salience Versus Proportional Reasoning: Rethinking the Mechanism Behind Graphical Display Effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 31(4). 473–486. 11 indexed citations
5.
Stone, Eric R., et al.. (2018). Distinguishing the Ratio Bias from Unsystematic Error: Situation and Individual‐difference Effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 31(4). 587–601. 6 indexed citations
6.
Stone, Eric R., et al.. (2016). Designing Graphs to Communicate Risks: Understanding How the Choice of Graphical Format Influences Decision Making. Risk Analysis. 37(4). 612–628. 26 indexed citations
7.
Stone, Eric R., et al.. (2015). Effects of Numerical Versus Foreground-Only Icon Displays on Understanding of Risk Magnitudes. Journal of Health Communication. 20(10). 1230–1241. 24 indexed citations
8.
DeKay, Michael L., et al.. (2013). Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice. Judgment and Decision Making. 8(6). 662–677. 12 indexed citations
9.
Merkle, Edgar C., Mark Steyvers, Thomas S. Wallsten, et al.. (2012). The aggregative contingent estimation system: Selecting, rewarding, and training experts in a wisdom of crowds approach to forecasting. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 75–76. 7 indexed citations
10.
DeKay, Michael L., et al.. (2011). Sizing up information distortion: Quantifying its effect on the subjective values of choice options. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 19(2). 349–356. 12 indexed citations
11.
Stone, Eric R.. (2007). Measuring Impacts of Restoration on Small Mammals in a Mixed-grass Colorado Prairie. Ecological Restoration. 25(3). 183–190. 16 indexed citations
12.
Schirillo, James A. & Eric R. Stone. (2005). The Greater Ability of Graphical Versus Numerical Displays to Increase Risk Avoidance Involves a Common Mechanism. Risk Analysis. 25(3). 555–566. 60 indexed citations
13.
Stone, Eric R., et al.. (2003). The Impact of Acuity on Performance of Four Clinical Measures of Contrast Sensitivity in Alzheimer's Disease. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 58(1). P54–P62. 40 indexed citations
14.
Best, Deborah L., et al.. (2003). Children’s decision making: the effects of training, reinforcement, and memory aids. Cognitive Development. 18(2). 247–268. 26 indexed citations
15.
Price, Paul C. & Eric R. Stone. (2003). Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: evidence for a confidence heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 17(1). 39–57. 167 indexed citations
16.
Stone, Eric R., et al.. (1997). Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 3(4). 243–256. 11 indexed citations
17.
Arkes, Hal R., et al.. (1994). The Psychology of Windfall Gains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 59(3). 331–347. 280 indexed citations
18.
Stone, Eric R., J. Frank Yates, & Andrew M. Parker. (1994). Risk Communication: Absolute versus Relative Expressions of Low-Probability Risks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 60(3). 387–408. 112 indexed citations
19.
Stone, Eric R. & Charles H. Trost. (1991). Predators, risks and context for mobbing and alarm calls in black-billed magpies. Animal Behaviour. 41(4). 633–638. 21 indexed citations
20.
Baker, Myron Charles, et al.. (1988). Evidence Against Observational Learning in Storage and Recovery of Seeds by Black-Capped Chickadees. The Auk. 105(3). 492–497. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026