Jane M. Thayer

525 citations
20 papers · 345 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jane M. Thayer

19 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers

Jane M. Thayer
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • General Decision Sciences 66
  • Accounting 238
  • Finance 104
  • Management Information Systems 52
  • Strategy and Management 76
Replace Kendall Bowlin with:
Kendall Bowlin United States
Sudip Bhattacharjee United States
Garry Marchant United States
Christine J. Nolder United States
Yuping Jia Germany
Shawn M. Davis United States
Jason L. Smith United States
Yachang Zeng Singapore
David N. Dreman United States
Craig Emby Canada
Jane M. Thayer relative to Kendall Bowlin United States Kendall Bowlin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Kendall Bowlin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane M. Thayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane M. Thayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane M. Thayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane M. Thayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane M. Thayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane M. Thayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane M. Thayer. The network helps show where Jane M. Thayer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jane M. Thayer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane M. Thayer Line = papers co-authored together Jane M. Thayer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20220
2 20213
3 20202
4 201831
5 201540
6 201432
7
Why Do Socially Responsible Firms Manage Earnings
20142
8 20138
9
Together Growing Fruitful Disciples Framework
20121
10 201259
11 201118
12 20114
13 20113
14 20116
15
Determinants of Investors’ Information Search: Credibility and Confirmation
20102
16 201068
17 200934
18 20087
19
The Popcorn Dragon
19893
20 197122

About Jane M. Thayer

Jane M. Thayer is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Accounting, Finance, Safety Research and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 20 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (14 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (3 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (66 citations), Accounting (238 citations), Finance (104 citations), Management Information Systems (52 citations) and Strategy and Management (76 citations). Jane M. Thayer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn Kadous, Lisa Koonce, Tina D. Carpenter, Molly Mercer, Keith L. Jones, Joseph F. Brazel, Rick C. Warne, William B. Tayler, Donald Young and Roger D. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, Review of Accounting Studies, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Journal of Behavioral Finance.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026