Jane L. Reimers
- Accounting top 5%
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance 8
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics 2
-
- Ethics in Business and Education 2
- Safety Research top 5%
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies 6
- Management Information Systems top 10%
-
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 2
-
- Water Quality and Resources Studies 1
-
- Cultural Differences and Values 1
-
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior 1
- Journals
- Journal of Business Ethics (1 paper)The Accounting Review (1 paper)Accounting Organizations and Society (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jane L. Reimers
14 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Accounting 282
- General Decision Sciences 45
- Information Systems and Management 121
- Safety Research 85
- Management Information Systems 52
Countries citing papers authored by Jane L. Reimers
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane L. Reimers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane L. Reimers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane L. Reimers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane L. Reimers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane L. Reimers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane L. Reimers. The network helps show where Jane L. Reimers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Jane L. Reimers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 92 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 3 | Accounting Meets Strategy: Share Repurchase Programs | 2010 | 2 |
| 4 | 2009 | 14 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 186 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 8 | Financial Accounting: A Business Process Approach | 2001 | 9 |
| 9 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 10 | The Audit Risk Model | 2000 | 2 |
| 11 | 2000 | 36 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 44 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 14 | The effect of containment information and error frequency on projection of sample errors | 1994 | 3 |
| 15 | 1992 | 30 |
About Jane L. Reimers
Jane L. Reimers is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Accounting, having authored 15 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (6 papers), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Water Quality and Resources Studies (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (282 citations), General Decision Sciences (45 citations) and Information Systems and Management (121 citations). Jane L. Reimers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tina D. Carpenter, Meindert Fennema, Stephen Butler, J. Clay Singleton and Gregory J. Gerard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, The Accounting Review and Accounting Organizations and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.