Jane Kim

4.2k total citations
123 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Jane Kim is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Kim has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in General Health Professions, 25 papers in Clinical Psychology and 24 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Jane Kim's work include Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (9 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (9 papers). Jane Kim is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (9 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (9 papers). Jane Kim collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Spain. Jane Kim's co-authors include Paul A. Lotke, Charles L. Nelson, Laura Weiss Roberts, Manisha Desai, Jess H. Lonner, Ruth Melia, Nigam H. Shah, Freddy Abnousi, Rebecca A. Bernert and Thomas F. Imperiale and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Lancet and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Jane Kim

114 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Kim United States 26 587 528 477 273 222 123 2.5k
Cédric Baumann France 29 662 1.1× 513 1.0× 195 0.4× 193 0.7× 231 1.0× 157 2.5k
Sabine Oertelt‐Prigione Germany 27 434 0.7× 593 1.1× 235 0.5× 291 1.1× 333 1.5× 103 3.6k
Doreen M. Agnese United States 23 253 0.4× 407 0.8× 723 1.5× 136 0.5× 212 1.0× 83 2.4k
Dawn M. Holman United States 27 245 0.4× 990 1.9× 694 1.5× 200 0.7× 239 1.1× 61 3.2k
Sandra Gardner Canada 27 205 0.3× 533 1.0× 423 0.9× 161 0.6× 276 1.2× 119 2.7k
Nimesh Patel United States 19 306 0.5× 256 0.5× 275 0.6× 544 2.0× 317 1.4× 53 2.3k
Jennifer Gibson United States 27 294 0.5× 336 0.6× 487 1.0× 148 0.5× 135 0.6× 47 3.0k
Amber Salter United States 34 267 0.5× 475 0.9× 364 0.8× 136 0.5× 196 0.9× 218 4.5k
Mary Sullivan United States 26 643 1.1× 434 0.8× 791 1.7× 551 2.0× 215 1.0× 85 2.8k
Martin Smith South Africa 21 367 0.6× 220 0.4× 339 0.7× 220 0.8× 176 0.8× 107 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Kim. The network helps show where Jane Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Kim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Kim. Jane Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stade, Elizabeth Cameron, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Jane Kim, & Shannon Wiltsey Stirman. (2025). Readiness evaluation for artificial intelligence-mental health deployment and implementation (READI): A review and proposed framework.. PubMed. 6(2). 111–122. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
4.
Stade, Elizabeth Cameron, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Jane Kim, & Shannon Wiltsey Stirman. (2025). Readiness Evaluation for AI-Mental Health Deployment and Implementation (READI): A review and proposed framework. 2 indexed citations
5.
Hogg, Justin, et al.. (2025). Users' Perceptions and Trust in AI in Direct-to-Consumer mHealth: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 13. e64715–e64715.
6.
Stade, Elizabeth Cameron, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Jane Kim, & Shannon Wiltsey Stirman. (2024). Readiness Evaluation for AI-Mental Health Deployment and Implementation (READI): A review and proposed framework. PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints).
7.
Kim, Jane, et al.. (2024). Understanding Physician’s Perspectives on AI in Health Care: Protocol for a Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Vignette Study. JMIR Research Protocols. 13. e54787–e54787. 6 indexed citations
8.
Stade, Elizabeth Cameron, Johannes C. Eichstaedt, Jane Kim, & Shannon Wiltsey Stirman. (2024). Readiness Evaluation for AI-Mental Health Deployment and Implementation (READI): A review and proposed framework. 1 indexed citations
9.
10.
11.
Batchelder, Abigail, et al.. (2021). Intersecting internalized stigmas and HIV self-care among men who have sex with men and who use substances. Social Science & Medicine. 275. 113824–113824. 25 indexed citations
12.
Kim, Jane, et al.. (2021). Perceived protectiveness of research safeguards and influences on willingness to participate in research: A novel MTurk pilot study. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 138. 200–206. 1 indexed citations
13.
Kim, Jane, et al.. (2021). Analysis of Attacks and Security Level for Multivariate Quadratic Based Signature Scheme Rainbow. Information Security and Cryptology. 31(3). 533–544. 1 indexed citations
14.
Kim, Jane, et al.. (2020). Attitudes of Mothers Regarding Willingness to Enroll Their Children in Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 15(5). 452–464. 1 indexed citations
15.
Kim, Jane, et al.. (2019). Attitudes Regarding Enrollment in a Genetic Research Project: An Informed Consent Simulation Study Comparing Views of People With Depression, Diabetes, and Neither Condition. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 14(4). 328–337. 1 indexed citations
16.
Kim, Jane. (2019). Suffocate or Innovate: An Observation of California's Regulatory Framework for Cryptocurrency. Loyola of Los Angeles law review. 52(3). 339. 2 indexed citations
17.
Cremer, Miriam, Maurício Maza, Karla Alfaro, et al.. (2016). Scale-Up of an Human Papillomavirus Testing Implementation Program in El Salvador. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 21(1). 26–32. 23 indexed citations
18.
Kim, Jane, et al.. (2015). Validity of Morisky Medication Adherence Scales in Assessment of Statin Adherence in Dyslipidemic Patients. 5(3). 332–337. 1 indexed citations
19.
Roberts, Laura Weiss & Jane Kim. (2014). Giving voice to study volunteers: Comparing views of mentally ill, physically ill, and healthy protocol participants on ethical aspects of clinical research. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 56. 90–97. 18 indexed citations
20.
Siskind, Dan, Paul Bolton, & Jane Kim. (2007). Country contextualization of cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for depression in Chile and Uganda using a Markov model. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 10. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Cédric Baumann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sabine Oertelt‐Prigione Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Doreen M. Agnese Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dawn M. Holman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sandra Gardner Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nimesh Patel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer Gibson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amber Salter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Sullivan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martin Smith
Rankless by CCL
2026