Jan Löfqvist

3.4k total citations
70 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Jan Löfqvist is a scholar working on Insect Science, Genetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Jan Löfqvist has authored 70 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 61 papers in Insect Science, 30 papers in Genetics and 28 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Jan Löfqvist's work include Insect and Pesticide Research (38 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (36 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (30 papers). Jan Löfqvist is often cited by papers focused on Insect and Pesticide Research (38 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (36 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (30 papers). Jan Löfqvist collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Finland. Jan Löfqvist's co-authors include Bill S. Hansson, Günnar Bergström, Peter Anderson, Christer Löfstedt, Fredrik Schlyter, Jan N. C. van der Pers, Marie Bengtsson, John A. Byers, Olle Anderbrant and Peter Witzgall and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Jan Löfqvist

70 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Jan Löfqvist
M. C. Birch United States
T. L. Payne United States
A. K. Minks Netherlands
Allard A. Cossé United States
Lyle K. Gaston United States
M. C. Birch United States
Jan Löfqvist
Citations per year, relative to Jan Löfqvist Jan Löfqvist (= 1×) peers M. C. Birch

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Löfqvist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Löfqvist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Löfqvist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Löfqvist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Löfqvist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Löfqvist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Löfqvist. The network helps show where Jan Löfqvist may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Löfqvist

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Löfqvist. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Löfqvist based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Löfqvist. Jan Löfqvist is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anderbrant, Olle, et al.. (2010). Field Response of Male Pine Sawflies, Neodiprion sertifer (Diprionidae), to Sex Pheromone Analogs in Japan and Sweden. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 36(9). 969–977. 4 indexed citations
3.
Löfstedt, Christer, Junwei Zhu, Mikhail V. Kozlov, et al.. (2004). Identification of the Sex Pheromone of the Currant Shoot Borer Lampronia capitella. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 30(3). 643–658. 18 indexed citations
4.
Hillbur, Ylva, et al.. (2001). A chiral Sex Pheromone System in the Pea Midge, Contarinia pisi. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 27(7). 1391–1407. 20 indexed citations
5.
Coracini, M. D. A., Marie Bengtsson, Jan Löfqvist, et al.. (2001). Identification of a Four-Component Sex Pheromone Blend in <I>Bonagota cranaodes</I> (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 94(4). 911–914. 15 indexed citations
6.
Bäckman, Anna‐Carin, Peter Anderson, Marie Bengtsson, et al.. (2000). Antennal response of codling moth males, Cydia pomonella L. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), to the geometric isomers of codlemone and codlemone acetate. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 186(6). 513–519. 33 indexed citations
7.
Svensson, Mats, et al.. (1998). Mating Behavior and Reproductive Potential in the Turnip Moth Agrotis segetum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Insect Behavior. 11(3). 343–359. 34 indexed citations
8.
Witzgall, Peter, Anna‐Carin Bäckman, Marie Bengtsson, et al.. (1996). Potential of a blend of E8,E10‐120H and E8,E10‐12Ac for mating disruption of codling moth, Cydia pomonella L. (Lep., Tortricidae). Journal of Applied Entomology. 120(1-5). 611–614. 11 indexed citations
9.
Witzgall, Peter, Marie Bengtsson, G. Karg, et al.. (1996). Behavioral observations and measurements of aerial pheromone in a mating disruption trial against pea mothCydia nigricana F. (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 22(2). 191–206. 16 indexed citations
10.
Anderson, Peter & Jan Löfqvist. (1996). Oviposition Deterrents from Potato, Wheat Germ, Larval Frass, and Artificial Diet for Agrotis segetum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology. 25(3). 653–658. 11 indexed citations
11.
Anderbrant, Olle, Marie Bengtsson, Jan Löfqvist, & Peter Bæckström. (1992). Field response of the pine sawflyNeodiprion sertifer to controlled release of diprionyl acetate, diprionyl propionate andtrans-perillenal. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 18(10). 1707–1725. 30 indexed citations
12.
Hansson, Bill S., Jan N. C. van der Pers, Hans‐Erik Högberg, et al.. (1991). Sex pheromone perception in male pine sawflies, Neodiprion sertifer (Hymenoptera; Diprionidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 168(5). 533–538. 49 indexed citations
13.
Högberg, Hans‐Erik, Erik Hedenström, Ann‐Britt Wassgren, et al.. (1990). Synthesis and gas chromatographic separation of the eight stereoisomers of diprionol and their acetates, components of the sex pheromone of pine sawflies. Tetrahedron. 46(8). 3007–3018. 57 indexed citations
14.
Bæckström, Peter, Fredrik Björkling, Ulla Jacobsson, et al.. (1989). Structures, absolute configurations, and syntheses of volatile signals from three sympatric ant-lion species,Euroleon nostras, Grocus bore, andMyrmeleon formicarius (Neuroptera: Myrmeleontidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology. 15(1). 61–80. 16 indexed citations
15.
Anderbrant, Olle & Jan Löfqvist. (1988). Relation between First and Second Brood Production in the Bark Beetle Ips Typographus (Scolytidae). Oikos. 53(3). 357–357. 25 indexed citations
16.
Lanne, Boel, Fredrik Schlyter, John A. Byers, et al.. (1987). Differences in attraction to semiochemicals present in sympatric pine shoot beetles,Tomicus minor andT. piniperda. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 13(5). 1045–1067. 82 indexed citations
17.
Löfstedt, Christer, Charles E. Linn, & Jan Löfqvist. (1985). Behavioral responses of male turnip moths,Agrotis segetum, to sex pheromone in a flight tunnel and in the field. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 11(9). 1209–1221. 40 indexed citations
18.
Löfstedt, Christer, Jan N. C. van der Pers, Jan Löfqvist, & Boel Lanne. (1983). SEX PHEROMONE OF THE CONE PYRALID DIORYCTRIA ABIETELLA. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 34(1). 20–26. 17 indexed citations
19.
Löfstedt, Christer, Jan N. C. van der Pers, Jan Löfqvist, et al.. (1982). Sex pheromone components of the turnip moth,Agrotis segetum. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 8(10). 1305–1321. 104 indexed citations
20.
Löfqvist, Jan. (1977). Toxic Properties of the Chemical Defence Systems in the Competitive Ants Formica rufa and F. sanguinea. Oikos. 28(1). 137–137. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026