Jan Löfqvist
- Insect Science top 0.1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Genetics top 2%
- Ecology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Bill S. HanssonGünnar BergströmPeter AndersonChrister LöfstedtFredrik SchlyterJan N. C. van der PersMarie BengtssonJohn A. Byers
- Topics
- Insect and Pesticide Research (38 papers)Insect Pheromone Research and Control (36 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (30 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
In The Last Decade
Jan Löfqvist
70 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Insect Science 2.1k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 931
- Genetics 849
- Ecology 727
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 564
Countries citing papers authored by Jan Löfqvist
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Löfqvist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Löfqvist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Löfqvist more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Löfqvist
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Löfqvist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Löfqvist. The network helps show where Jan Löfqvist may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Löfqvist
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Löfqvist. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Löfqvist based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Löfqvist. Jan Löfqvist is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 90 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 57 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 82 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 104 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Jan Löfqvist
Jan Löfqvist is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (38 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (36 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (2.1k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (931 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (564 citations). Jan Löfqvist has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Bill S. Hansson, Günnar Bergström, Peter Anderson, Christer Löfstedt, Fredrik Schlyter, Jan N. C. van der Pers, Marie Bengtsson, John A. Byers, Olle Anderbrant and Peter Witzgall. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.