Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

8.3k papers and 470.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.3k papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 470.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences usually cover Molecular Biology (5.2k papers), Cell Biology (1.2k papers) and Immunology (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of RNA Research and Splicing (390 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (341 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (333 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences are Bernd Bukau, Matthias P. Mayer, Takuya Suzuki, Alicia Llorente, Nina P. Hessvik, Geoffrey Burnstock, Liang Tong, Thresia Thomas, John R. Arthur and Vijay Pancholi.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

Countries where authors publish in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025