M. C. Birch

2.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
59 papers, 2.3k citations indexed

About

M. C. Birch is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. C. Birch has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 2.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Insect Science, 34 papers in Ecology and 26 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in M. C. Birch's work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (33 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (23 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (20 papers). M. C. Birch is often cited by papers focused on Forest Insect Ecology and Management (33 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (23 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (20 papers). M. C. Birch collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. M. C. Birch's co-authors include T. L. Payne, Catherine E. Kennedy, T. D. Paine, Douglas M. Light, David L. Wood, Pavel Švihra, Guy M. Poppy, Tristram D. Wyatt, Thomas C. Baker and Robin T. Aplin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Annual Review of Entomology.

In The Last Decade

M. C. Birch

59 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction 1986 2026 1999 2012 1986 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. C. Birch United States 28 1.7k 1.0k 829 771 337 59 2.3k
T. L. Payne United States 26 1.8k 1.0× 1.3k 1.3× 528 0.6× 519 0.7× 368 1.1× 85 2.2k
Jan Löfqvist Sweden 30 2.1k 1.2× 727 0.7× 849 1.0× 931 1.2× 564 1.7× 70 2.6k
G. G. Grant Canada 24 1.4k 0.8× 750 0.7× 432 0.5× 506 0.7× 158 0.5× 88 1.7k
A. K. Minks Netherlands 21 2.4k 1.3× 321 0.3× 552 0.7× 886 1.1× 290 0.9× 54 2.7k
Sadao Wakamura Japan 24 1.5k 0.9× 757 0.7× 496 0.6× 640 0.8× 156 0.5× 141 1.9k
Olle Anderbrant Sweden 29 1.9k 1.1× 1.1k 1.1× 518 0.6× 682 0.9× 282 0.8× 122 2.4k
G. P. Waldbauer United States 25 1.3k 0.7× 314 0.3× 578 0.7× 1.0k 1.3× 240 0.7× 100 2.0k
V. G. Dethier United States 21 1.0k 0.6× 283 0.3× 388 0.5× 781 1.0× 456 1.4× 36 1.6k
Sadahiro Tatsuki Japan 28 1.5k 0.9× 198 0.2× 777 0.9× 624 0.8× 533 1.6× 110 2.0k
William E. Conner United States 25 722 0.4× 391 0.4× 702 0.8× 1.5k 2.0× 180 0.5× 56 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by M. C. Birch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. C. Birch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. C. Birch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. C. Birch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. C. Birch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. C. Birch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. C. Birch. The network helps show where M. C. Birch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. C. Birch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. C. Birch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. C. Birch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. C. Birch. M. C. Birch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Goulson, Dave, M. C. Birch, & Tristram D. Wyatt. (1993). Paternal investment in relation to size in the deathwatch beetle,Xestobium rufovillosum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae), and evidence for female selection for large mates. Journal of Insect Behavior. 6(5). 539–547. 15 indexed citations
2.
Wyatt, Tristram D. & M. C. Birch. (1992). Evolution of good taste. Nature. 360(6400). 120–120. 1 indexed citations
3.
Payne, T. L., et al.. (1990). Olfactory-based behavioral interactions among five species in the southern pine bark beetle group. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 16(12). 3317–3331. 25 indexed citations
4.
White, Peter & M. C. Birch. (1987). Female sex pheromone of the common furniture beetleAnobium punctatum (Coleoptera: Anobiidae): Extraction, identification, and bioassays. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 13(7). 1695–1706. 32 indexed citations
5.
Haynes, Kenneth F. & M. C. Birch. (1984). The periodicity of pheromone release and male responsiveness in the artichoke plume moth, Platyptilia carduidactyla. Physiological Entomology. 9(3). 287–295. 29 indexed citations
6.
Light, Douglas M., M. C. Birch, & T. D. Paine. (1983). Laboratory study of intraspecific and interspecific competition within and between two sympatric bark beetle species, Ips pini and I. paraconfusus1. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie. 96(1-5). 233–241. 40 indexed citations
7.
Birch, M. C., Jeffrey C. Miller, & T. D. Paine. (1982). Evaluation of two attempts to trap defined populations ofScolytus multistriatus. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 8(1). 125–136. 6 indexed citations
8.
Light, Douglas M. & M. C. Birch. (1982). Bark beetle enantiomeric chemoreception: Greater sensitivity to allomone than pheromone. Die Naturwissenschaften. 69(5). 243–245. 10 indexed citations
9.
Birch, M. C., T. D. Paine, & Jeffrey C. Miller. (1981). Effectiveness of pheromone mass-trapping of the smaller European elm bark beetle.. California Agriculture. 35(1). 6–7. 9 indexed citations
10.
Paine, T. D., M. C. Birch, & Pavel Švihra. (1981). Niche breadth and resource partitioning by four sympatric species of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Oecologia. 48(1). 1–6. 87 indexed citations
11.
Light, Douglas M. & M. C. Birch. (1979). Electrophysiological basis for the behavioural response of male and female Trichoplusia ni to synthetic female pheromone. Journal of Insect Physiology. 25(2). 161–167. 30 indexed citations
12.
Birch, M. C.. (1978). Chemical Communication in Pine Bark Beetles. American Scientist. 66(4). 409–419. 57 indexed citations
13.
Birch, M. C., et al.. (1978). Insect flotsam: an unstudied marine resource. Ecological Entomology. 3(2). 87–97. 19 indexed citations
14.
Ehler, L. E., et al.. (1978). Attraction ofCarpophilus Spp. (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) to volatile compounds present in figs. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 4(6). 701–707. 28 indexed citations
15.
Birch, M. C., et al.. (1977). Pheromone traps to suppress populations of the smaller European elm bark beetle. California Agriculture. 31(11). 4–7. 3 indexed citations
16.
Birch, M. C.. (1977). Response of both sexes of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to virgin females and to synthetic pheromone. Ecological Entomology. 2(2). 99–104. 50 indexed citations
17.
Birch, M. C. & Douglas M. Light. (1977). Inhibition of the attractant pheromone response inIps pini andI. paraconfusus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Field evaluation of ipsenol and linalool. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 3(3). 257–267. 26 indexed citations
18.
Birch, M. C.. (1974). Seasonal Variation in Pheromone-Associated Behavior and Physiology of Ips pini1, 2. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 67(1). 58–60. 17 indexed citations
19.
Young, J. Christopher, Robert G. Brownlee, J. Otto Rodin, et al.. (1973). Identification of linalool produced by two species of bark beetles of the genus Ips. Journal of Insect Physiology. 19(8). 1615–1622. 27 indexed citations
20.
Birch, M. C.. (1971). Intrinsic Limitations in the Use of Electroantennograms to Bioassay Male Pheromones in Lepidoptera. Nature. 233(5314). 57–58. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026