M. D. A. Coracini
- Insect Science top 1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Plant Science
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Peter WitzgallMarie BengtssonIlme LiblikasMarco TasinAnna‐Carin BäckmanC. IoriattiJan LöfqvistAnna‐Karin Borg‐Karlson
- Topics
- Insect Pheromone Research and Control (15 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (11 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers)
In The Last Decade
M. D. A. Coracini
19 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Insect Science 486
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 233
- Plant Science 113
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 76
- Genetics 66
Countries citing papers authored by M. D. A. Coracini
This map shows the geographic impact of M. D. A. Coracini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. D. A. Coracini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. D. A. Coracini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. D. A. Coracini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. D. A. Coracini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. D. A. Coracini. The network helps show where M. D. A. Coracini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. D. A. Coracini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. D. A. Coracini. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. D. A. Coracini based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. D. A. Coracini. M. D. A. Coracini is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 84 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 108 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 81 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 103 | |
| 17 | Semiochemicals claim territory - sex pheromones and plant volatiles for control of codling moth and Brazilian apple leafroller | 1 |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 65 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About M. D. A. Coracini
M. D. A. Coracini is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 20 papers that have together received 546 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pheromone Research and Control (15 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (11 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (486 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (233 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (76 citations). M. D. A. Coracini has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Sweden and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Peter Witzgall, Marie Bengtsson, Ilme Liblikas, Marco Tasin, Anna‐Carin Bäckman, C. Ioriatti, Jan Löfqvist, Anna‐Karin Borg‐Karlson, Paulo H. G. Zarbin and Stefan Rauscher. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Phytochemistry and Journal of Chemical Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.